netfilter: nf_nat_h323: fix logical-not-parentheses warning
Clang produces the following warning: net/ipv4/netfilter/nf_nat_h323.c:553:6: error: logical not is only applied to the left hand side of this comparison [-Werror,-Wlogical-not-parentheses] if (!set_h225_addr(skb, protoff, data, dataoff, taddr, ^ add parentheses after the '!' to evaluate the comparison first add parentheses around left hand side expression to silence this warning There's not necessarily a bug here, but it's cleaner to return early, ex: if (x) return ... rather than: if (x == 0) ... else return Also added a return code check that seemed to be missing in one instance. Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6b5dc98e8f
commit
eee6ebbac1
|
@ -252,16 +252,16 @@ static int nat_rtp_rtcp(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
|
|||
if (set_h245_addr(skb, protoff, data, dataoff, taddr,
|
||||
&ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3,
|
||||
htons((port & htons(1)) ? nated_port + 1 :
|
||||
nated_port)) == 0) {
|
||||
/* Save ports */
|
||||
info->rtp_port[i][dir] = rtp_port;
|
||||
info->rtp_port[i][!dir] = htons(nated_port);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
nated_port))) {
|
||||
nf_ct_unexpect_related(rtp_exp);
|
||||
nf_ct_unexpect_related(rtcp_exp);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Save ports */
|
||||
info->rtp_port[i][dir] = rtp_port;
|
||||
info->rtp_port[i][!dir] = htons(nated_port);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Success */
|
||||
pr_debug("nf_nat_h323: expect RTP %pI4:%hu->%pI4:%hu\n",
|
||||
&rtp_exp->tuple.src.u3.ip,
|
||||
|
@ -370,15 +370,15 @@ static int nat_h245(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
|
|||
/* Modify signal */
|
||||
if (set_h225_addr(skb, protoff, data, dataoff, taddr,
|
||||
&ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3,
|
||||
htons(nated_port)) == 0) {
|
||||
/* Save ports */
|
||||
info->sig_port[dir] = port;
|
||||
info->sig_port[!dir] = htons(nated_port);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
htons(nated_port))) {
|
||||
nf_ct_unexpect_related(exp);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Save ports */
|
||||
info->sig_port[dir] = port;
|
||||
info->sig_port[!dir] = htons(nated_port);
|
||||
|
||||
pr_debug("nf_nat_q931: expect H.245 %pI4:%hu->%pI4:%hu\n",
|
||||
&exp->tuple.src.u3.ip,
|
||||
ntohs(exp->tuple.src.u.tcp.port),
|
||||
|
@ -462,7 +462,11 @@ static int nat_q931(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
|
|||
/* Modify signal */
|
||||
if (set_h225_addr(skb, protoff, data, 0, &taddr[idx],
|
||||
&ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3,
|
||||
htons(nated_port)) == 0) {
|
||||
htons(nated_port))) {
|
||||
nf_ct_unexpect_related(exp);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Save ports */
|
||||
info->sig_port[dir] = port;
|
||||
info->sig_port[!dir] = htons(nated_port);
|
||||
|
@ -471,14 +475,13 @@ static int nat_q931(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
|
|||
if (idx > 0 &&
|
||||
get_h225_addr(ct, *data, &taddr[0], &addr, &port) &&
|
||||
(ntohl(addr.ip) & 0xff000000) == 0x7f000000) {
|
||||
set_h225_addr(skb, protoff, data, 0, &taddr[0],
|
||||
if (set_h225_addr(skb, protoff, data, 0, &taddr[0],
|
||||
&ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3,
|
||||
info->sig_port[!dir]);
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
info->sig_port[!dir])) {
|
||||
nf_ct_unexpect_related(exp);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Success */
|
||||
pr_debug("nf_nat_ras: expect Q.931 %pI4:%hu->%pI4:%hu\n",
|
||||
|
@ -550,9 +553,9 @@ static int nat_callforwarding(struct sk_buff *skb, struct nf_conn *ct,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* Modify signal */
|
||||
if (!set_h225_addr(skb, protoff, data, dataoff, taddr,
|
||||
if (set_h225_addr(skb, protoff, data, dataoff, taddr,
|
||||
&ct->tuplehash[!dir].tuple.dst.u3,
|
||||
htons(nated_port)) == 0) {
|
||||
htons(nated_port))) {
|
||||
nf_ct_unexpect_related(exp);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue