ARM: OMAP5: clock: No Freqsel on OMAP5 devices too
OMAP5 does not have freqsel either, so checks needs to be extended. Infact only OMAP343X devices has the freqsel support, so fix the check accordingly so that future patching can be avoided. Reported-by: Archit Taneja <archit@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1348bbf942
commit
ecf51648c1
|
@ -307,10 +307,10 @@ static int omap3_noncore_dpll_program(struct clk_hw_omap *clk, u16 freqsel)
|
|||
_omap3_noncore_dpll_bypass(clk);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Set jitter correction. No jitter correction for OMAP4 and 3630
|
||||
* since freqsel field is no longer present
|
||||
* Set jitter correction. Jitter correction applicable for OMAP343X
|
||||
* only since freqsel field is no longer present on other devices.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!soc_is_am33xx() && !cpu_is_omap44xx() && !cpu_is_omap3630()) {
|
||||
if (cpu_is_omap343x()) {
|
||||
v = __raw_readl(dd->control_reg);
|
||||
v &= ~dd->freqsel_mask;
|
||||
v |= freqsel << __ffs(dd->freqsel_mask);
|
||||
|
@ -500,9 +500,8 @@ int omap3_noncore_dpll_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
|
|||
if (dd->last_rounded_rate == 0)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* No freqsel on AM335x, OMAP4 and OMAP3630 */
|
||||
if (!soc_is_am33xx() && !cpu_is_omap44xx() &&
|
||||
!cpu_is_omap3630()) {
|
||||
/* Freqsel is available only on OMAP343X devices */
|
||||
if (cpu_is_omap343x()) {
|
||||
freqsel = _omap3_dpll_compute_freqsel(clk,
|
||||
dd->last_rounded_n);
|
||||
WARN_ON(!freqsel);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue