sched/numa: Fix period_slot recalculation
The original code is as intended and was meant to scale the difference between the NUMA_PERIOD_THRESHOLD and local/remote ratio when adjusting the scan period. The period_slot recalculation can be dropped. Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@ah.jp.nec.com> Acked-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1386833006-6600-4-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
82897b4fd3
commit
e777b63bbd
|
@ -1342,7 +1342,6 @@ static void update_task_scan_period(struct task_struct *p,
|
|||
* scanning faster if shared accesses dominate as it may
|
||||
* simply bounce migrations uselessly
|
||||
*/
|
||||
period_slot = DIV_ROUND_UP(diff, NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS);
|
||||
ratio = DIV_ROUND_UP(private * NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS, (private + shared));
|
||||
diff = (diff * ratio) / NUMA_PERIOD_SLOTS;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue