objtool: Fix seg fault on bad switch table entry
In one rare case, Clang generated the following code: 5ca: 83 e0 21 and $0x21,%eax 5cd: b9 04 00 00 00 mov $0x4,%ecx 5d2: ff 24 c5 00 00 00 00 jmpq *0x0(,%rax,8) 5d5: R_X86_64_32S .rodata+0x38 which uses the corresponding jump table relocations: 000000000038 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 834 000000000040 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 5d9 000000000048 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000050 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000058 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000060 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000068 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000070 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000078 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000080 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000088 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000090 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000098 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000a0 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000a8 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000b0 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000b8 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000c0 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000c8 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000d0 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000d8 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000e0 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000e8 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000f0 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 0000000000f8 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000100 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000108 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000110 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000118 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000120 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000128 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000130 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + b96 000000000138 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 82f 000000000140 000200000001 R_X86_64_64 0000000000000000 .text + 828 Since %eax was masked with 0x21, only the first two and the last two entries are possible. Objtool doesn't actually emulate all the code, so it isn't smart enough to know that all the middle entries aren't reachable. They point to the NOP padding area after the end of the function, so objtool seg faulted when it tried to dereference a NULL insn->func. After this fix, objtool still gives an "unreachable" error because it stops reading the jump table when it encounters the bad addresses: /home/jpoimboe/objtool-tests/adm1275.o: warning: objtool: adm1275_probe()+0x828: unreachable instruction While the above code is technically correct, it's very wasteful of memory -- it uses 34 jump table entries when only 4 are needed. It's also not possible for objtool to validate this type of switch table because the unused entries point outside the function and objtool has no way of determining if that's intentional. Hopefully the Clang folks can fix it. Reported-by: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Tested-by: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/a9db88eec4f1ca089e040989846961748238b6d8.1563413318.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com
This commit is contained in:
parent
bd98c81346
commit
e65050b94d
|
@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static int add_jump_table(struct objtool_file *file, struct instruction *insn,
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Make sure the destination is in the same function: */
|
/* Make sure the destination is in the same function: */
|
||||||
if (dest_insn->func->pfunc != pfunc)
|
if (!dest_insn->func || dest_insn->func->pfunc != pfunc)
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
alt = malloc(sizeof(*alt));
|
alt = malloc(sizeof(*alt));
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue