riscv: cleanup svpbmt cpufeature probing
For better readability (and compile time coverage) use IS_ENABLED instead of ifdef and drop the new unneeded switch statement. Signed-off-by: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@sntech.de> Reviewed-by: Guo Ren <guoren@kernel.org> Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Reviewed-by: Andrew Jones <ajones@ventanamicro.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220905111027.2463297-2-heiko@sntech.de Signed-off-by: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@rivosinc.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
cdcdb00855
commit
e47bddcb2e
|
@ -253,16 +253,13 @@ void __init riscv_fill_hwcap(void)
|
|||
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ALTERNATIVE
|
||||
static bool __init_or_module cpufeature_probe_svpbmt(unsigned int stage)
|
||||
{
|
||||
#ifdef CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT
|
||||
switch (stage) {
|
||||
case RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT:
|
||||
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RISCV_ISA_SVPBMT))
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
return riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SVPBMT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
if (stage == RISCV_ALTERNATIVES_EARLY_BOOT)
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
|
||||
return riscv_isa_extension_available(NULL, SVPBMT);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static bool __init_or_module cpufeature_probe_zicbom(unsigned int stage)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue