crypto: memneq - fix for archs without efficient unaligned access
Commitfe8c8a1268
introduced a possible build error for archs that do not have CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS set. :/ Fix this up by bringing else braces outside of the ifdef. Reported-by: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Fixes:fe8c8a1268
("crypto: more robust crypto_memneq") Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <dborkman@redhat.com> Acked-By: Cesar Eduardo Barros <cesarb@cesarb.eti.br> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d1dd206c2a
commit
e37b94ebff
|
@ -108,8 +108,9 @@ static inline unsigned long __crypto_memneq_16(const void *a, const void *b)
|
||||||
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq);
|
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq);
|
||||||
neq |= *(unsigned int *)(a+12) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+12);
|
neq |= *(unsigned int *)(a+12) ^ *(unsigned int *)(b+12);
|
||||||
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq);
|
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq);
|
||||||
} else {
|
} else
|
||||||
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */
|
#endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS */
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b);
|
neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b);
|
||||||
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq);
|
OPTIMIZER_HIDE_VAR(neq);
|
||||||
neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+1) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+1);
|
neq |= *(unsigned char *)(a+1) ^ *(unsigned char *)(b+1);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue