seccomp: Provide matching filter for introspection
Both the upcoming logging improvements and changes to RET_KILL will need to know which filter a given seccomp return value originated from. In order to delay logic processing of result until after the seccomp loop, this adds a single pointer assignment on matches. This will allow both log and RET_KILL logic to work off the filter rather than doing more expensive tests inside the time-critical run_filters loop. Running tight cycles of getpid() with filters attached shows no measurable difference in speed. Suggested-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@canonical.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f3f6e30669
commit
deb4de8b31
|
@ -171,10 +171,14 @@ static int seccomp_check_filter(struct sock_filter *filter, unsigned int flen)
|
|||
/**
|
||||
* seccomp_run_filters - evaluates all seccomp filters against @sd
|
||||
* @sd: optional seccomp data to be passed to filters
|
||||
* @match: stores struct seccomp_filter that resulted in the return value,
|
||||
* unless filter returned SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW, in which case it will
|
||||
* be unchanged.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns valid seccomp BPF response codes.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
|
||||
static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd,
|
||||
struct seccomp_filter **match)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct seccomp_data sd_local;
|
||||
u32 ret = SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW;
|
||||
|
@ -198,8 +202,10 @@ static u32 seccomp_run_filters(const struct seccomp_data *sd)
|
|||
for (; f; f = f->prev) {
|
||||
u32 cur_ret = BPF_PROG_RUN(f->prog, sd);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((cur_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION) < (ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION))
|
||||
if ((cur_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION) < (ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION)) {
|
||||
ret = cur_ret;
|
||||
*match = f;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -566,6 +572,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
|
|||
const bool recheck_after_trace)
|
||||
{
|
||||
u32 filter_ret, action;
|
||||
struct seccomp_filter *match = NULL;
|
||||
int data;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -574,7 +581,7 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
|
|||
*/
|
||||
rmb();
|
||||
|
||||
filter_ret = seccomp_run_filters(sd);
|
||||
filter_ret = seccomp_run_filters(sd, &match);
|
||||
data = filter_ret & SECCOMP_RET_DATA;
|
||||
action = filter_ret & SECCOMP_RET_ACTION;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -638,6 +645,11 @@ static int __seccomp_filter(int this_syscall, const struct seccomp_data *sd,
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
case SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Note that the "match" filter will always be NULL for
|
||||
* this action since SECCOMP_RET_ALLOW is the starting
|
||||
* state in seccomp_run_filters().
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
case SECCOMP_RET_KILL:
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue