spi: using pm_runtime_resume_and_get instead of pm_runtime_get_sync
Using pm_runtime_resume_and_get is more appropriate for simplifing code Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn> Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi <chi.minghao@zte.com.cn> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220418110226.2559081-1-chi.minghao@zte.com.cn Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
79422ed9bd
commit
dd769f1548
|
@ -1611,9 +1611,8 @@ static void __spi_pump_messages(struct spi_controller *ctlr, bool in_kthread)
|
||||||
mutex_lock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
|
mutex_lock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (!was_busy && ctlr->auto_runtime_pm) {
|
if (!was_busy && ctlr->auto_runtime_pm) {
|
||||||
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctlr->dev.parent);
|
ret = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(ctlr->dev.parent);
|
||||||
if (ret < 0) {
|
if (ret < 0) {
|
||||||
pm_runtime_put_noidle(ctlr->dev.parent);
|
|
||||||
dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n",
|
dev_err(&ctlr->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n",
|
||||||
ret);
|
ret);
|
||||||
mutex_unlock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
|
mutex_unlock(&ctlr->io_mutex);
|
||||||
|
@ -3548,10 +3547,9 @@ int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (spi->controller->auto_runtime_pm && spi->controller->set_cs) {
|
if (spi->controller->auto_runtime_pm && spi->controller->set_cs) {
|
||||||
status = pm_runtime_get_sync(spi->controller->dev.parent);
|
status = pm_runtime_resume_and_get(spi->controller->dev.parent);
|
||||||
if (status < 0) {
|
if (status < 0) {
|
||||||
mutex_unlock(&spi->controller->io_mutex);
|
mutex_unlock(&spi->controller->io_mutex);
|
||||||
pm_runtime_put_noidle(spi->controller->dev.parent);
|
|
||||||
dev_err(&spi->controller->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n",
|
dev_err(&spi->controller->dev, "Failed to power device: %d\n",
|
||||||
status);
|
status);
|
||||||
return status;
|
return status;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue