UbiquitousOS
/
OpenCloudOS-Kernel
mirror of https://gitee.com/OpenCloudOS/OpenCloudOS-Kernel.git
11
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Projects Releases Wiki Activity

bpf: Remove unused insn_cnt argument from visit_[func_call_]insn() 

Number of total instructions in BPF program (including subprogs) can and
is accessed from env->prog->len. visit_func_call_insn() doesn't do any
checks against insn_cnt anymore, relying on push_insn() to do this check
internally. So remove unnecessary insn_cnt input argument from
visit_func_call_insn() and visit_insn() functions.

Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20221207195534.2866030-1-andrii@kernel.org
This commit is contained in:
Andrii Nakryiko 2022-12-07 11:55:34 -08:00 committed by Daniel Borkmann
parent 0a6ea1ce82
commit dcb2288b1f
1 changed files with 5 additions and 6 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

11
kernel/bpf/verifier.c
View File

@ -12222,8 +12222,7 @@ static int push_insn(int t, int w, int e, struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
return DONE_EXPLORING;
}
static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, int insn_cnt,
struct bpf_insn *insns,
static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, struct bpf_insn *insns,
struct bpf_verifier_env *env,
bool visit_callee)
{
@ -12254,13 +12253,13 @@ static int visit_func_call_insn(int t, int insn_cnt,
* DONE_EXPLORING - the instruction was fully explored
* KEEP_EXPLORING - there is still work to be done before it is fully explored
*/
static int visit_insn(int t, int insn_cnt, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
static int visit_insn(int t, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
{
struct bpf_insn *insns = env->prog->insnsi;
int ret;
if (bpf_pseudo_func(insns + t))
return visit_func_call_insn(t, insn_cnt, insns, env, true);
return visit_func_call_insn(t, insns, env, true);
/* All non-branch instructions have a single fall-through edge. */
if (BPF_CLASS(insns[t].code) != BPF_JMP &&
@ -12279,7 +12278,7 @@ static int visit_insn(int t, int insn_cnt, struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
* async state will be pushed for further exploration.
*/
mark_prune_point(env, t);
return visit_func_call_insn(t, insn_cnt, insns, env,
return visit_func_call_insn(t, insns, env,
insns[t].src_reg == BPF_PSEUDO_CALL);
case BPF_JA:
@ -12336,7 +12335,7 @@ static int check_cfg(struct bpf_verifier_env *env)
while (env->cfg.cur_stack > 0) {
int t = insn_stack[env->cfg.cur_stack - 1];
ret = visit_insn(t, insn_cnt, env);
ret = visit_insn(t, env);
switch (ret) {
case DONE_EXPLORING:
insn_state[t] = EXPLORED;