vringh: Fix loop descriptors check in the indirect cases
We should use size of descriptor chain to test loop condition
in the indirect case. And another statistical count is also introduced
for indirect descriptors to avoid conflict with the statistical count
of direct descriptors.
Fixes: f87d0fbb57
("vringh: host-side implementation of virtio rings.")
Signed-off-by: Xie Yongji <xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <fam.zheng@bytedance.com>
Message-Id: <20220505100910.137-1-xieyongji@bytedance.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f38b3c6a78
commit
dbd29e0752
|
@ -292,7 +292,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
|
|||
int (*copy)(const struct vringh *vrh,
|
||||
void *dst, const void *src, size_t len))
|
||||
{
|
||||
int err, count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
|
||||
int err, count = 0, indirect_count = 0, up_next, desc_max;
|
||||
struct vring_desc desc, *descs;
|
||||
struct vringh_range range = { -1ULL, 0 }, slowrange;
|
||||
bool slow = false;
|
||||
|
@ -349,7 +349,12 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
|
|||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (count++ == vrh->vring.num) {
|
||||
if (up_next == -1)
|
||||
count++;
|
||||
else
|
||||
indirect_count++;
|
||||
|
||||
if (count > vrh->vring.num || indirect_count > desc_max) {
|
||||
vringh_bad("Descriptor loop in %p", descs);
|
||||
err = -ELOOP;
|
||||
goto fail;
|
||||
|
@ -411,6 +416,7 @@ __vringh_iov(struct vringh *vrh, u16 i,
|
|||
i = return_from_indirect(vrh, &up_next,
|
||||
&descs, &desc_max);
|
||||
slow = false;
|
||||
indirect_count = 0;
|
||||
} else
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue