netfilter: nf_tables: reject QUEUE/DROP verdict parameters

commit f342de4e2f33e0e39165d8639387aa6c19dff660 upstream.

This reverts commit e0abdadcc6.

core.c:nf_hook_slow assumes that the upper 16 bits of NF_DROP
verdicts contain a valid errno, i.e. -EPERM, -EHOSTUNREACH or similar,
or 0.

Due to the reverted commit, its possible to provide a positive
value, e.g. NF_ACCEPT (1), which results in use-after-free.

Its not clear to me why this commit was made.

NF_QUEUE is not used by nftables; "queue" rules in nftables
will result in use of "nft_queue" expression.

If we later need to allow specifiying errno values from userspace
(do not know why), this has to call NF_DROP_GETERR and check that
"err <= 0" holds true.

Fixes: e0abdadcc6 ("netfilter: nf_tables: accept QUEUE/DROP verdict parameters")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Notselwyn <notselwyn@pwning.tech>
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@netfilter.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Fuhai Wang <fuhaiwang@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: caelli <caelli@tencent.com>
Signed-off-by: Jianping Liu <frankjpliu@tencent.com>

net/netfilter/nf_tables_api.c

@@ -7524,16 +7524,10 @@ static int nft_verdict_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_data *data,
 	data->verdict.code = ntohl(nla_get_be32(tb[NFTA_VERDICT_CODE]));
 
 	switch (data->verdict.code) {
-	default:
-		switch (data->verdict.code & NF_VERDICT_MASK) {
-		case NF_ACCEPT:
-		case NF_DROP:
-		case NF_QUEUE:
-			break;
-		default:
-			return -EINVAL;
-		}
-		/* fall through */
+	case NF_ACCEPT:
+	case NF_DROP:
+	case NF_QUEUE:
+		break;
 	case NFT_CONTINUE:
 	case NFT_BREAK:
 	case NFT_RETURN:
@@ -7552,6 +7546,8 @@ static int nft_verdict_init(const struct nft_ctx *ctx, struct nft_data *data,
 		chain->use++;
 		data->verdict.chain = chain;
 		break;
+	default:
+		return -EINVAL;
 	}
 
 	desc->len = sizeof(data->verdict);