From 85140ef275f577f64e8a2c5789447222dfc14fc4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:25:59 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 1/9] ACPI: property: Return type of acpi_add_nondev_subnodes() should be bool The value acpi_add_nondev_subnodes() returns is bool so change the return type of the function to match that. Fixes: 445b0eb058f5 ("ACPI / property: Add support for data-only subnodes") Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 8 ++++---- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index d3173811614e..bc9a645f8bb7 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -155,10 +155,10 @@ static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_ok(acpi_handle scope, return acpi_nondev_subnode_data_ok(handle, link, list, parent); } -static int acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope, - const union acpi_object *links, - struct list_head *list, - struct fwnode_handle *parent) +static bool acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope, + const union acpi_object *links, + struct list_head *list, + struct fwnode_handle *parent) { bool ret = false; int i; From 1d52f10917a751f90e269a0ed9b6cca60dbe0300 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:26:00 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 2/9] ACPI: property: Tie data nodes to acpi handles ACPICA allows associating additional information (i.e. pointers with specific tag) to acpi_handles. The acpi_device's are associated to acpi_handle's in acpi_tie_acpi_dev() in scan.c, do the same here for the _DSD data nodes. This allows direct data node references in properties, implemented later on in the series. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++- 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index bc9a645f8bb7..9f34e01c2a9a 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -340,6 +340,43 @@ acpi_data_add_props(struct acpi_device_data *data, const guid_t *guid, return props; } +static void acpi_nondev_subnode_tag(acpi_handle handle, void *context) +{ +} + +static void acpi_untie_nondev_subnodes(struct acpi_device_data *data) +{ + struct acpi_data_node *dn; + + list_for_each_entry(dn, &data->subnodes, sibling) { + acpi_detach_data(dn->handle, acpi_nondev_subnode_tag); + + acpi_untie_nondev_subnodes(&dn->data); + } +} + +static bool acpi_tie_nondev_subnodes(struct acpi_device_data *data) +{ + struct acpi_data_node *dn; + + list_for_each_entry(dn, &data->subnodes, sibling) { + acpi_status status; + bool ret; + + status = acpi_attach_data(dn->handle, acpi_nondev_subnode_tag, dn); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { + acpi_handle_err(dn->handle, "Can't tag data node\n"); + return false; + } + + ret = acpi_tie_nondev_subnodes(&dn->data); + if (!ret) + return ret; + } + + return true; +} + static bool acpi_extract_properties(const union acpi_object *desc, struct acpi_device_data *data) { @@ -419,7 +456,9 @@ void acpi_init_properties(struct acpi_device *adev) &adev->data, acpi_fwnode_handle(adev))) adev->data.pointer = buf.pointer; - if (!adev->data.pointer) { + if (!adev->data.pointer || + !acpi_tie_nondev_subnodes(&adev->data)) { + acpi_untie_nondev_subnodes(&adev->data); acpi_handle_debug(adev->handle, "Invalid _DSD data, skipping\n"); ACPI_FREE(buf.pointer); } @@ -462,6 +501,7 @@ static void acpi_destroy_nondev_subnodes(struct list_head *list) void acpi_free_properties(struct acpi_device *adev) { + acpi_untie_nondev_subnodes(&adev->data); acpi_destroy_nondev_subnodes(&adev->data.subnodes); ACPI_FREE((void *)adev->data.pointer); adev->data.of_compatible = NULL; From 5ee772883af5ed2dfe17e8af2b09d7003344be6c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:26:01 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] ACPI: property: Use acpi_object_type consistently in property ref parsing The type of union acpi_object field type is acpi_object_type. Use that instead of int. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index 9f34e01c2a9a..b607e4829c1c 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -793,7 +793,7 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, * nor integer, return an error, we can't parse it. */ for (i = 0; element + i < end && i < num_args; i++) { - int type = element[i].type; + acpi_object_type type = element[i].type; if (type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) break; From 1aef25d9d1edbcf5b9af4611448d931d0752377c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:26:02 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 4/9] ACPI: property: Move property ref argument parsing into a new function Split out property reference argument parsing out of the __acpi_node_get_property_reference() function into a new one, acpi_get_ref_args(). The new function will be needed also for parsing string references soon. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 103 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------ 1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 45 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index b607e4829c1c..a741e6cce4b8 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -673,6 +673,58 @@ acpi_fwnode_get_named_child_node(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, return NULL; } +static int acpi_get_ref_args(struct fwnode_reference_args *args, + struct fwnode_handle *ref_fwnode, + const union acpi_object **element, + const union acpi_object *end, size_t num_args) +{ + u32 nargs = 0, i; + + /* + * Find the referred data extension node under the + * referred device node. + */ + for (; *element < end && (*element)->type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING; + (*element)++) { + const char *child_name = (*element)->string.pointer; + + ref_fwnode = acpi_fwnode_get_named_child_node(ref_fwnode, child_name); + if (!ref_fwnode) + return -EINVAL; + } + + /* + * Assume the following integer elements are all args. Stop counting on + * the first reference or end of the package arguments. In case of + * neither reference, nor integer, return an error, we can't parse it. + */ + for (i = 0; (*element) + i < end && i < num_args; i++) { + acpi_object_type type = (*element)[i].type; + + if (type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) + break; + + if (type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) + nargs++; + else + return -EINVAL; + } + + if (nargs > NR_FWNODE_REFERENCE_ARGS) + return -EINVAL; + + if (args) { + args->fwnode = ref_fwnode; + args->nargs = nargs; + for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) + args->args[i] = (*element)[i].integer.value; + } + + (*element) += nargs; + + return 0; +} + /** * __acpi_node_get_property_reference - returns handle to the referenced object * @fwnode: Firmware node to get the property from @@ -761,61 +813,22 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, end = element + obj->package.count; while (element < end) { - u32 nargs, i; - if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) { - struct fwnode_handle *ref_fwnode; - device = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(element->reference.handle); if (!device) return -EINVAL; - nargs = 0; element++; - /* - * Find the referred data extension node under the - * referred device node. - */ - for (ref_fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(device); - element < end && element->type == ACPI_TYPE_STRING; - element++) { - ref_fwnode = acpi_fwnode_get_named_child_node( - ref_fwnode, element->string.pointer); - if (!ref_fwnode) - return -EINVAL; - } - - /* - * Assume the following integer elements are all args. - * Stop counting on the first reference or end of the - * package arguments. In case of neither reference, - * nor integer, return an error, we can't parse it. - */ - for (i = 0; element + i < end && i < num_args; i++) { - acpi_object_type type = element[i].type; - - if (type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) - break; - if (type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) - nargs++; - else - return -EINVAL; - } - - if (nargs > NR_FWNODE_REFERENCE_ARGS) - return -EINVAL; - - if (idx == index) { - args->fwnode = ref_fwnode; - args->nargs = nargs; - for (i = 0; i < nargs; i++) - args->args[i] = element[i].integer.value; + ret = acpi_get_ref_args(idx == index ? args : NULL, + acpi_fwnode_handle(device), + &element, end, num_args); + if (ret < 0) + return ret; + if (idx == index) return 0; - } - element += nargs; } else if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) { if (idx == index) return -ENOENT; From 88af7bbdea37af59a43072243b358753189fd7a5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:26:03 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 5/9] ACPI: property: Switch node property referencing from ifs to a switch __acpi_node_get_property_reference() uses a series of if () statements for testing the same variable. There's soon going to be one more value to be tested. Switch to use switch() instead. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++------------------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index a741e6cce4b8..43bd3f61f635 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -778,11 +778,9 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, if (ret) return ret == -EINVAL ? -ENOENT : -EINVAL; - /* - * The simplest case is when the value is a single reference. Just - * return that reference then. - */ - if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) { + switch (obj->type) { + case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE: + /* Plain single reference without arguments. */ if (index) return -ENOENT; @@ -793,19 +791,21 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, args->fwnode = acpi_fwnode_handle(device); args->nargs = 0; return 0; + case ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE: + /* + * If it is not a single reference, then it is a package of + * references followed by number of ints as follows: + * + * Package () { REF, INT, REF, INT, INT } + * + * The index argument is then used to determine which reference + * the caller wants (along with the arguments). + */ + break; + default: + return -EINVAL; } - /* - * If it is not a single reference, then it is a package of - * references followed by number of ints as follows: - * - * Package () { REF, INT, REF, INT, INT } - * - * The index argument is then used to determine which reference - * the caller wants (along with the arguments). - */ - if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) - return -EINVAL; if (index >= obj->package.count) return -ENOENT; @@ -813,7 +813,8 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, end = element + obj->package.count; while (element < end) { - if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE) { + switch (element->type) { + case ACPI_TYPE_LOCAL_REFERENCE: device = acpi_fetch_acpi_dev(element->reference.handle); if (!device) return -EINVAL; @@ -829,11 +830,13 @@ int __acpi_node_get_property_reference(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, if (idx == index) return 0; - } else if (element->type == ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) { + break; + case ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER: if (idx == index) return -ENOENT; element++; - } else { + break; + default: return -EINVAL; } From 923044133367c8d72662938da0ea531bbdb39799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:26:04 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 6/9] ACPI: property: Unify integer value reading functions Unify functions reading ACPI property integer values into a single macro using C99 _Generic(). Also use size_t for the counter instead of int. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 96 +++++++++++++---------------------------- 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index 43bd3f61f635..b751eb98106c 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -908,67 +908,33 @@ static int acpi_data_prop_read_single(const struct acpi_device_data *data, return ret; } -static int acpi_copy_property_array_u8(const union acpi_object *items, u8 *val, - size_t nval) -{ - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < nval; i++) { - if (items[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) - return -EPROTO; - if (items[i].integer.value > U8_MAX) - return -EOVERFLOW; - - val[i] = items[i].integer.value; - } - return 0; -} - -static int acpi_copy_property_array_u16(const union acpi_object *items, - u16 *val, size_t nval) -{ - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < nval; i++) { - if (items[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) - return -EPROTO; - if (items[i].integer.value > U16_MAX) - return -EOVERFLOW; - - val[i] = items[i].integer.value; - } - return 0; -} - -static int acpi_copy_property_array_u32(const union acpi_object *items, - u32 *val, size_t nval) -{ - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < nval; i++) { - if (items[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) - return -EPROTO; - if (items[i].integer.value > U32_MAX) - return -EOVERFLOW; - - val[i] = items[i].integer.value; - } - return 0; -} - -static int acpi_copy_property_array_u64(const union acpi_object *items, - u64 *val, size_t nval) -{ - int i; - - for (i = 0; i < nval; i++) { - if (items[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) - return -EPROTO; - - val[i] = items[i].integer.value; - } - return 0; -} +#define acpi_copy_property_array_uint(items, val, nval) \ + ({ \ + typeof(items) __items = items; \ + typeof(val) __val = val; \ + typeof(nval) __nval = nval; \ + size_t i; \ + int ret = 0; \ + \ + for (i = 0; i < __nval; i++) { \ + if (__items[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) { \ + ret = -EPROTO; \ + break; \ + } \ + if (__items[i].integer.value > _Generic(__val, \ + u8: U8_MAX, \ + u16: U16_MAX, \ + u32: U32_MAX, \ + u64: U64_MAX, \ + default: 0U)) { \ + ret = -EOVERFLOW; \ + break; \ + } \ + \ + __val[i] = __items[i].integer.value; \ + } \ + ret; \ + }) static int acpi_copy_property_array_string(const union acpi_object *items, char **val, size_t nval) @@ -1025,16 +991,16 @@ static int acpi_data_prop_read(const struct acpi_device_data *data, switch (proptype) { case DEV_PROP_U8: - ret = acpi_copy_property_array_u8(items, (u8 *)val, nval); + ret = acpi_copy_property_array_uint(items, (u8 *)val, nval); break; case DEV_PROP_U16: - ret = acpi_copy_property_array_u16(items, (u16 *)val, nval); + ret = acpi_copy_property_array_uint(items, (u16 *)val, nval); break; case DEV_PROP_U32: - ret = acpi_copy_property_array_u32(items, (u32 *)val, nval); + ret = acpi_copy_property_array_uint(items, (u32 *)val, nval); break; case DEV_PROP_U64: - ret = acpi_copy_property_array_u64(items, (u64 *)val, nval); + ret = acpi_copy_property_array_uint(items, (u64 *)val, nval); break; case DEV_PROP_STRING: ret = acpi_copy_property_array_string( From 103e10c69c611efabccf57d799c4b191d53ee765 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2022 09:57:46 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 7/9] ACPI: property: Add support for parsing buffer property UUID Add support for newly added buffer property UUID, as defined in the DSD guide section 3.3 [1] Link: https://github.com/UEFI/DSD-Guide/blob/main/src/dsd-guide.adoc#buffer-data-extension-uuid # [1] Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 142 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- include/acpi/acpi_bus.h | 3 +- include/linux/acpi.h | 2 +- 3 files changed, 132 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index b751eb98106c..7e3d163a6b1f 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -55,14 +55,19 @@ static const guid_t ads_guid = GUID_INIT(0xdbb8e3e6, 0x5886, 0x4ba6, 0x87, 0x95, 0x13, 0x19, 0xf5, 0x2a, 0x96, 0x6b); +static const guid_t buffer_prop_guid = + GUID_INIT(0xedb12dd0, 0x363d, 0x4085, + 0xa3, 0xd2, 0x49, 0x52, 0x2c, 0xa1, 0x60, 0xc4); + static bool acpi_enumerate_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope, - const union acpi_object *desc, + union acpi_object *desc, struct acpi_device_data *data, struct fwnode_handle *parent); -static bool acpi_extract_properties(const union acpi_object *desc, +static bool acpi_extract_properties(acpi_handle handle, + union acpi_object *desc, struct acpi_device_data *data); -static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(const union acpi_object *desc, +static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(union acpi_object *desc, acpi_handle handle, const union acpi_object *link, struct list_head *list, @@ -81,7 +86,7 @@ static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_extract(const union acpi_object *desc, INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dn->data.properties); INIT_LIST_HEAD(&dn->data.subnodes); - result = acpi_extract_properties(desc, &dn->data); + result = acpi_extract_properties(handle, desc, &dn->data); if (handle) { acpi_handle scope; @@ -156,7 +161,7 @@ static bool acpi_nondev_subnode_ok(acpi_handle scope, } static bool acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope, - const union acpi_object *links, + union acpi_object *links, struct list_head *list, struct fwnode_handle *parent) { @@ -164,7 +169,7 @@ static bool acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope, int i; for (i = 0; i < links->package.count; i++) { - const union acpi_object *link, *desc; + union acpi_object *link, *desc; acpi_handle handle; bool result; @@ -204,7 +209,7 @@ static bool acpi_add_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope, } static bool acpi_enumerate_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope, - const union acpi_object *desc, + union acpi_object *desc, struct acpi_device_data *data, struct fwnode_handle *parent) { @@ -212,7 +217,8 @@ static bool acpi_enumerate_nondev_subnodes(acpi_handle scope, /* Look for the ACPI data subnodes GUID. */ for (i = 0; i < desc->package.count; i += 2) { - const union acpi_object *guid, *links; + const union acpi_object *guid; + union acpi_object *links; guid = &desc->package.elements[i]; links = &desc->package.elements[i + 1]; @@ -325,7 +331,7 @@ static bool acpi_is_property_guid(const guid_t *guid) struct acpi_device_properties * acpi_data_add_props(struct acpi_device_data *data, const guid_t *guid, - const union acpi_object *properties) + union acpi_object *properties) { struct acpi_device_properties *props; @@ -377,7 +383,104 @@ static bool acpi_tie_nondev_subnodes(struct acpi_device_data *data) return true; } -static bool acpi_extract_properties(const union acpi_object *desc, +static void acpi_data_add_buffer_props(acpi_handle handle, + struct acpi_device_data *data, + union acpi_object *properties) +{ + struct acpi_device_properties *props; + union acpi_object *package; + size_t alloc_size; + unsigned int i; + u32 *count; + + if (check_mul_overflow((size_t)properties->package.count, + sizeof(*package) + sizeof(void *), + &alloc_size) || + check_add_overflow(sizeof(*props) + sizeof(*package), alloc_size, + &alloc_size)) { + acpi_handle_warn(handle, + "can't allocate memory for %u buffer props", + properties->package.count); + return; + } + + props = kvzalloc(alloc_size, GFP_KERNEL); + if (!props) + return; + + props->guid = &buffer_prop_guid; + props->bufs = (void *)(props + 1); + props->properties = (void *)(props->bufs + properties->package.count); + + /* Outer package */ + package = props->properties; + package->type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE; + package->package.elements = package + 1; + count = &package->package.count; + *count = 0; + + /* Inner packages */ + package++; + + for (i = 0; i < properties->package.count; i++) { + struct acpi_buffer buf = { ACPI_ALLOCATE_BUFFER }; + union acpi_object *property = &properties->package.elements[i]; + union acpi_object *prop, *obj, *buf_obj; + acpi_status status; + + if (property->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE || + property->package.count != 2) { + acpi_handle_warn(handle, + "buffer property %u has %u entries\n", + i, property->package.count); + continue; + } + + prop = &property->package.elements[0]; + obj = &property->package.elements[1]; + + if (prop->type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING || + obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_STRING) { + acpi_handle_warn(handle, + "wrong object types %u and %u\n", + prop->type, obj->type); + continue; + } + + status = acpi_evaluate_object_typed(handle, obj->string.pointer, + NULL, &buf, + ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER); + if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) { + acpi_handle_warn(handle, + "can't evaluate \"%*pE\" as buffer\n", + obj->string.length, + obj->string.pointer); + continue; + } + + package->type = ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE; + package->package.elements = prop; + package->package.count = 2; + + buf_obj = buf.pointer; + + /* Replace the string object with a buffer object */ + obj->type = ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER; + obj->buffer.length = buf_obj->buffer.length; + obj->buffer.pointer = buf_obj->buffer.pointer; + + props->bufs[i] = buf.pointer; + package++; + (*count)++; + } + + if (*count) + list_add(&props->list, &data->properties); + else + kvfree(props); +} + +static bool acpi_extract_properties(acpi_handle scope, union acpi_object *desc, struct acpi_device_data *data) { int i; @@ -387,7 +490,8 @@ static bool acpi_extract_properties(const union acpi_object *desc, /* Look for the device properties GUID. */ for (i = 0; i < desc->package.count; i += 2) { - const union acpi_object *guid, *properties; + const union acpi_object *guid; + union acpi_object *properties; guid = &desc->package.elements[i]; properties = &desc->package.elements[i + 1]; @@ -401,6 +505,12 @@ static bool acpi_extract_properties(const union acpi_object *desc, properties->type != ACPI_TYPE_PACKAGE) break; + if (guid_equal((guid_t *)guid->buffer.pointer, + &buffer_prop_guid)) { + acpi_data_add_buffer_props(scope, data, properties); + continue; + } + if (!acpi_is_property_guid((guid_t *)guid->buffer.pointer)) continue; @@ -447,7 +557,7 @@ void acpi_init_properties(struct acpi_device *adev) if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) goto out; - if (acpi_extract_properties(buf.pointer, &adev->data)) { + if (acpi_extract_properties(adev->handle, buf.pointer, &adev->data)) { adev->data.pointer = buf.pointer; if (acpi_of) acpi_init_of_compatible(adev); @@ -477,8 +587,14 @@ static void acpi_free_device_properties(struct list_head *list) struct acpi_device_properties *props, *tmp; list_for_each_entry_safe(props, tmp, list, list) { + u32 i; + list_del(&props->list); - kfree(props); + /* Buffer data properties were separately allocated */ + if (props->bufs) + for (i = 0; i < props->properties->package.count; i++) + ACPI_FREE(props->bufs[i]); + kvfree(props); } } diff --git a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h index 0dc1ea0b52f5..a1690000ac95 100644 --- a/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h +++ b/include/acpi/acpi_bus.h @@ -344,8 +344,9 @@ struct acpi_device_physical_node { struct acpi_device_properties { const guid_t *guid; - const union acpi_object *properties; + union acpi_object *properties; struct list_head list; + void **bufs; }; /* ACPI Device Specific Data (_DSD) */ diff --git a/include/linux/acpi.h b/include/linux/acpi.h index 44975c1bbe12..7c46f152106b 100644 --- a/include/linux/acpi.h +++ b/include/linux/acpi.h @@ -1243,7 +1243,7 @@ static inline bool acpi_dev_has_props(const struct acpi_device *adev) struct acpi_device_properties * acpi_data_add_props(struct acpi_device_data *data, const guid_t *guid, - const union acpi_object *properties); + union acpi_object *properties); int acpi_node_prop_get(const struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *propname, void **valptr); From 369af6bf2c28f9f57438e82f953f6351cf2a94cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2022 14:26:06 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 8/9] ACPI: property: Read buffer properties as integers Instead of adding a new property type, read buffer properties as integers. Even though the internal representation in ACPI is different, the data type is the same (byte) than on 8-bit integers. Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----- 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index 7e3d163a6b1f..d26f630f2a7c 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -1033,6 +1033,10 @@ static int acpi_data_prop_read_single(const struct acpi_device_data *data, int ret = 0; \ \ for (i = 0; i < __nval; i++) { \ + if (__items->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) { \ + __val[i] = __items->buffer.pointer[i]; \ + continue; \ + } \ if (__items[i].type != ACPI_TYPE_INTEGER) { \ ret = -EPROTO; \ break; \ @@ -1092,18 +1096,41 @@ static int acpi_data_prop_read(const struct acpi_device_data *data, } ret = acpi_data_get_property_array(data, propname, ACPI_TYPE_ANY, &obj); + if (ret && proptype >= DEV_PROP_U8 && proptype <= DEV_PROP_U64) + ret = acpi_data_get_property(data, propname, ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER, + &obj); if (ret) return ret; - if (!val) - return obj->package.count; + if (!val) { + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) + return obj->buffer.length; - if (proptype != DEV_PROP_STRING && nval > obj->package.count) - return -EOVERFLOW; + return obj->package.count; + } + + switch (proptype) { + case DEV_PROP_STRING: + break; + case DEV_PROP_U8 ... DEV_PROP_U64: + if (obj->type == ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) { + if (nval > obj->buffer.length) + return -EOVERFLOW; + break; + } + fallthrough; + default: + if (nval > obj->package.count) + return -EOVERFLOW; + break; + } if (nval == 0) return -EINVAL; - items = obj->package.elements; + if (obj->type != ACPI_TYPE_BUFFER) + items = obj->package.elements; + else + items = obj; switch (proptype) { case DEV_PROP_U8: From 46981fa78490e16589559cec8c762e5527d665d2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sakari Ailus Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2022 00:12:13 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 9/9] ACPI: property: Fix error handling in acpi_init_properties() buf.pointer, memory for storing _DSD data and nodes, was released if either parsing properties or, as recently added, attaching data node tags failed. Alas, properties were still left pointing to this memory if parsing properties were successful but attaching data node tags failed. Fix this by separating error handling for the two, and leaving properties intact if data nodes cannot be tagged for a reason or another. Reported-by: kernel test robot Fixes: 1d52f10917a7 ("ACPI: property: Tie data nodes to acpi handles") Signed-off-by: Sakari Ailus [ rjw: Drop unrelated white space change ] Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki --- drivers/acpi/property.c | 7 ++++--- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/acpi/property.c b/drivers/acpi/property.c index d26f630f2a7c..f649ae9645c9 100644 --- a/drivers/acpi/property.c +++ b/drivers/acpi/property.c @@ -566,11 +566,12 @@ void acpi_init_properties(struct acpi_device *adev) &adev->data, acpi_fwnode_handle(adev))) adev->data.pointer = buf.pointer; - if (!adev->data.pointer || - !acpi_tie_nondev_subnodes(&adev->data)) { - acpi_untie_nondev_subnodes(&adev->data); + if (!adev->data.pointer) { acpi_handle_debug(adev->handle, "Invalid _DSD data, skipping\n"); ACPI_FREE(buf.pointer); + } else { + if (!acpi_tie_nondev_subnodes(&adev->data)) + acpi_untie_nondev_subnodes(&adev->data); } out: