mm/memory_hotplug.c: call register_mem_sect_under_node()
When hotplugging memory, it is possible that two calls are being made to register_mem_sect_under_node(). One comes from __add_section()->hotplug_memory_register() and the other from add_memory_resource()->link_mem_sections() if we had to register a new node. In case we had to register a new node, hotplug_memory_register() will only handle/allocate the memory_block's since register_mem_sect_under_node() will return right away because the node it is not online yet. I think it is better if we leave hotplug_memory_register() to handle/allocate only memory_block's and make link_mem_sections() to call register_mem_sect_under_node(). So this patch removes the call to register_mem_sect_under_node() from hotplug_memory_register(), and moves the call to link_mem_sections() out of the condition, so it will always be called. In this way we only have one place where the memory sections are registered. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180622111839.10071-3-osalvador@techadventures.net Signed-off-by: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de> Reviewed-by: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@oracle.com> Tested-by: Reza Arbab <arbab@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Tested-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com> Cc: Pasha Tatashin <Pavel.Tatashin@microsoft.com> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b9ff036082
commit
d5b6f6a361
|
@ -736,8 +736,6 @@ int hotplug_memory_register(int nid, struct mem_section *section)
|
|||
mem->section_count++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (mem->section_count == sections_per_block)
|
||||
ret = register_mem_sect_under_node(mem, nid, false);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&mem_sysfs_mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1123,6 +1123,7 @@ int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, bool online)
|
|||
u64 start, size;
|
||||
bool new_node = false;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
unsigned long start_pfn, nr_pages;
|
||||
|
||||
start = res->start;
|
||||
size = resource_size(res);
|
||||
|
@ -1151,34 +1152,23 @@ int __ref add_memory_resource(int nid, struct resource *res, bool online)
|
|||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
goto error;
|
||||
|
||||
/* we online node here. we can't roll back from here. */
|
||||
node_set_online(nid);
|
||||
|
||||
if (new_node) {
|
||||
unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
|
||||
ret = __register_one_node(nid);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
goto register_fail;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* link memory sections under this node. This is already
|
||||
* done when creatig memory section in register_new_memory
|
||||
* but that depends to have the node registered so offline
|
||||
* nodes have to go through register_node.
|
||||
* TODO clean up this mess.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = link_mem_sections(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, false);
|
||||
register_fail:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If sysfs file of new node can't create, cpu on the node
|
||||
/* If sysfs file of new node can't be created, cpu on the node
|
||||
* can't be hot-added. There is no rollback way now.
|
||||
* So, check by BUG_ON() to catch it reluctantly..
|
||||
* We online node here. We can't roll back from here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
node_set_online(nid);
|
||||
ret = __register_one_node(nid);
|
||||
BUG_ON(ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* link memory sections under this node.*/
|
||||
start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
|
||||
ret = link_mem_sections(nid, start_pfn, nr_pages, false);
|
||||
BUG_ON(ret);
|
||||
|
||||
/* create new memmap entry */
|
||||
firmware_map_add_hotplug(start, start + size, "System RAM");
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue