[PATCH] fix MAX_USER_RT_PRIO and MAX_RT_PRIO
Here's the patch again to fix the code to handle if the values between MAX_USER_RT_PRIO and MAX_RT_PRIO are different. Without this patch, an SMP system will crash if the values are different. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
18586e7216
commit
d46523ea32
|
@ -420,7 +420,7 @@ xpc_activating(void *__partid)
|
|||
partid_t partid = (u64) __partid;
|
||||
struct xpc_partition *part = &xpc_partitions[partid];
|
||||
unsigned long irq_flags;
|
||||
struct sched_param param = { sched_priority: MAX_USER_RT_PRIO - 1 };
|
||||
struct sched_param param = { sched_priority: MAX_RT_PRIO - 1 };
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3486,7 +3486,7 @@ static void __setscheduler(struct task_struct *p, int policy, int prio)
|
|||
p->policy = policy;
|
||||
p->rt_priority = prio;
|
||||
if (policy != SCHED_NORMAL)
|
||||
p->prio = MAX_USER_RT_PRIO-1 - p->rt_priority;
|
||||
p->prio = MAX_RT_PRIO-1 - p->rt_priority;
|
||||
else
|
||||
p->prio = p->static_prio;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -3518,7 +3518,8 @@ recheck:
|
|||
* 1..MAX_USER_RT_PRIO-1, valid priority for SCHED_NORMAL is 0.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (param->sched_priority < 0 ||
|
||||
param->sched_priority > MAX_USER_RT_PRIO-1)
|
||||
(p->mm && param->sched_priority > MAX_USER_RT_PRIO-1) ||
|
||||
(!p->mm && param->sched_priority > MAX_RT_PRIO-1))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
if ((policy == SCHED_NORMAL) != (param->sched_priority == 0))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue