mm: vmscan: use shrinker_rwsem to protect shrinker_maps allocation
Since memcg_shrinker_map_size just can be changed under holding shrinker_rwsem exclusively, the read side can be protected by holding read lock, so it sounds superfluous to have a dedicated mutex. Kirill Tkhai suggested use write lock since: * We want the assignment to shrinker_maps is visible for shrink_slab_memcg(). * The rcu_dereference_protected() dereferrencing in shrink_slab_memcg(), but in case of we use READ lock in alloc_shrinker_maps(), the dereferrencing is not actually protected. * READ lock makes alloc_shrinker_info() racy against memory allocation fail. alloc_shrinker_info()->free_shrinker_info() may free memory right after shrink_slab_memcg() dereferenced it. You may say shrink_slab_memcg()->mem_cgroup_online() protects us from it? Yes, sure, but this is not the thing we want to remember in the future, since this spreads modularity. And a test with heavy paging workload didn't show write lock makes things worse. Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20210311190845.9708-4-shy828301@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz> Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com> Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com> Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com> Cc: Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com> Cc: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2bfd36374e
commit
d27cf2aa0d
18
mm/vmscan.c
18
mm/vmscan.c
|
@ -187,7 +187,6 @@ static DECLARE_RWSEM(shrinker_rwsem);
|
|||
#ifdef CONFIG_MEMCG
|
||||
|
||||
static int memcg_shrinker_map_size;
|
||||
static DEFINE_MUTEX(memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
static void free_shrinker_map_rcu(struct rcu_head *head)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -201,8 +200,6 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
|
|||
struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
|
||||
int nid;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_node(nid) {
|
||||
pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
|
||||
old = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_map, true);
|
||||
|
@ -250,7 +247,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
|
|||
if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
|
||||
down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
|
||||
size = memcg_shrinker_map_size;
|
||||
for_each_node(nid) {
|
||||
map = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
|
||||
|
@ -261,7 +258,7 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
|
|||
}
|
||||
rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map, map);
|
||||
}
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
|
||||
up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -276,9 +273,10 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
|
|||
if (size <= old_size)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
|
||||
if (!root_mem_cgroup)
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
|
||||
lockdep_assert_held(&shrinker_rwsem);
|
||||
|
||||
memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
do {
|
||||
|
@ -287,13 +285,13 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
|
|||
ret = expand_one_shrinker_map(memcg, size, old_size);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
|
||||
goto unlock;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
|
||||
unlock:
|
||||
out:
|
||||
if (!ret)
|
||||
memcg_shrinker_map_size = size;
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&memcg_shrinker_map_mutex);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue