PCI/VPD: Make missing VPD message less alarming
Realtek RTL8169/8168/8125 NIC families indicate VPD capability and an optional VPD EEPROM can be connected via I2C/SPI. However I haven't seen any card or system with such a VPD EEPROM yet. The missing EEPROM causes the following warning whenever e.g. lscpi -vv is executed. invalid short VPD tag 00 at offset 01 The warning confuses users, and I think we should handle the situation more gently. Therefore, if first VPD byte is read as 0x00, assume a missing optional VPD PROM and replace the warning with a more descriptive message at info level. [bhelgaas: fix pre-existing whitespace] Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/ccbc11f1-4dbb-e2c8-d0ea-559e06d4c340@gmail.com Signed-off-by: Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
384d0c6820
commit
d1df5f3f4c
|
@ -71,10 +71,14 @@ static size_t pci_vpd_size(struct pci_dev *dev, size_t old_size)
|
||||||
size_t off = 0;
|
size_t off = 0;
|
||||||
unsigned char header[1+2]; /* 1 byte tag, 2 bytes length */
|
unsigned char header[1+2]; /* 1 byte tag, 2 bytes length */
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
while (off < old_size &&
|
while (off < old_size && pci_read_vpd(dev, off, 1, header) == 1) {
|
||||||
pci_read_vpd(dev, off, 1, header) == 1) {
|
|
||||||
unsigned char tag;
|
unsigned char tag;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
if (!header[0] && !off) {
|
||||||
|
pci_info(dev, "Invalid VPD tag 00, assume missing optional VPD EPROM\n");
|
||||||
|
return 0;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (header[0] & PCI_VPD_LRDT) {
|
if (header[0] & PCI_VPD_LRDT) {
|
||||||
/* Large Resource Data Type Tag */
|
/* Large Resource Data Type Tag */
|
||||||
tag = pci_vpd_lrdt_tag(header);
|
tag = pci_vpd_lrdt_tag(header);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue