swiotlb: optimize get_max_slots()
Use a simple logical shift and increment to calculate the number of slots taken by the DMA segment boundary. At least GCC-13 is not able to optimize the expression, producing this horrible assembly code on x86: cmpq $-1, %rcx je .L364 addq $2048, %rcx shrq $11, %rcx movq %rcx, %r13 .L331: // rest of the function here... // after function epilogue and return: .L364: movabsq $9007199254740992, %r13 jmp .L331 After the optimization, the code looks more reasonable: shrq $11, %r11 leaq 1(%r11), %rbx Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <petr.tesarik.ext@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f94cb36e76
commit
d069ed288a
|
@ -903,9 +903,7 @@ static inline phys_addr_t slot_addr(phys_addr_t start, phys_addr_t idx)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
static inline unsigned long get_max_slots(unsigned long boundary_mask)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (boundary_mask == ~0UL)
|
||||
return 1UL << (BITS_PER_LONG - IO_TLB_SHIFT);
|
||||
return nr_slots(boundary_mask + 1);
|
||||
return (boundary_mask >> IO_TLB_SHIFT) + 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned int wrap_area_index(struct io_tlb_pool *mem, unsigned int index)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue