ACPI / PM: Check status of power resources under mutexes

It certainly is not a good idea to execute _ON or _OFF and _STA
for the same power resource at the same time which may happen in
some circumstances in theory.  To prevent that from happening,
read the power state of each power resource under its mutex, as
that will prevent the state from being changed at the same time.

Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-01-06 23:38:57 +01:00 committed by Len Brown
parent 36237fa0a7
commit d0515d9fec
1 changed files with 20 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -145,9 +145,8 @@ static int acpi_power_get_state(acpi_handle handle, int *state)
static int acpi_power_get_list_state(struct acpi_handle_list *list, int *state)
{
int result = 0, state1;
u32 i = 0;
int cur_state;
int i = 0;
if (!list || !state)
return -EINVAL;
@ -155,25 +154,33 @@ static int acpi_power_get_list_state(struct acpi_handle_list *list, int *state)
/* The state of the list is 'on' IFF all resources are 'on'. */
for (i = 0; i < list->count; i++) {
/*
* The state of the power resource can be obtained by
* using the ACPI handle. In such case it is unnecessary to
* get the Power resource first and then get its state again.
*/
result = acpi_power_get_state(list->handles[i], &state1);
struct acpi_power_resource *resource;
acpi_handle handle = list->handles[i];
int result;
result = acpi_power_get_context(handle, &resource);
if (result)
return result;
*state = state1;
mutex_lock(&resource->resource_lock);
if (*state != ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON)
result = acpi_power_get_state(handle, &cur_state);
mutex_unlock(&resource->resource_lock);
if (result)
return result;
if (cur_state != ACPI_POWER_RESOURCE_STATE_ON)
break;
}
ACPI_DEBUG_PRINT((ACPI_DB_INFO, "Resource list is %s\n",
*state ? "on" : "off"));
cur_state ? "on" : "off"));
return result;
*state = cur_state;
return 0;
}
static int __acpi_power_on(struct acpi_power_resource *resource)