iommu/vt-d: Be less pessimistic about domain coherency where possible
In commit 2e12bc29
("intel-iommu: Default to non-coherent for domains
unattached to iommus") we decided to err on the side of caution and
always assume that it's possible that a device will be attached which is
behind a non-coherent IOMMU.
In some cases, however, that just *cannot* happen. If there *are* no
IOMMUs in the system which are non-coherent, then we don't need to do
it. And flushing the dcache is a *significant* performance hit.
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
214e39aa36
commit
d050196087
|
@ -592,18 +592,31 @@ static struct intel_iommu *domain_get_iommu(struct dmar_domain *domain)
|
|||
|
||||
static void domain_update_iommu_coherency(struct dmar_domain *domain)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
struct dmar_drhd_unit *drhd;
|
||||
struct intel_iommu *iommu;
|
||||
int i, found = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
i = find_first_bit(domain->iommu_bmp, g_num_of_iommus);
|
||||
|
||||
domain->iommu_coherency = i < g_num_of_iommus ? 1 : 0;
|
||||
domain->iommu_coherency = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_set_bit(i, domain->iommu_bmp, g_num_of_iommus) {
|
||||
found = 1;
|
||||
if (!ecap_coherent(g_iommus[i]->ecap)) {
|
||||
domain->iommu_coherency = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (found)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* No hardware attached; use lowest common denominator */
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
for_each_active_iommu(iommu, drhd) {
|
||||
if (!ecap_coherent(iommu->ecap)) {
|
||||
domain->iommu_coherency = 0;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void domain_update_iommu_snooping(struct dmar_domain *domain)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue