regulator: refcount fixes
Fix some refcounting issues in the regulator framework, supporting regulator_disable() for regulators that were enabled at boot time via machine constraints: - Update those regulators' usecounts after enabling, so they can cleanly be disabled at that level. - Remove the problematic per-consumer usecount, so there's only one level of enable/disable. Buggy consumers could notice different bug symptoms. The main example would be refcounting bugs; also, any (out-of-tree) users of the experimental regulator_set_optimum_mode() stuff which don't call it when they're done using a regulator. This is a net minor codeshrink. Signed-off-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@users.sourceforge.net> Acked-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> Signed-off-by: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1dc60343f8
commit
cd94b50530
|
@ -52,7 +52,6 @@ struct regulator {
|
|||
int uA_load;
|
||||
int min_uV;
|
||||
int max_uV;
|
||||
int enabled; /* count of client enables */
|
||||
char *supply_name;
|
||||
struct device_attribute dev_attr;
|
||||
struct regulator_dev *rdev;
|
||||
|
@ -815,6 +814,7 @@ static int set_machine_constraints(struct regulator_dev *rdev,
|
|||
rdev->constraints = NULL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
rdev->use_count = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
print_constraints(rdev);
|
||||
|
@ -1068,10 +1068,6 @@ void regulator_put(struct regulator *regulator)
|
|||
mutex_lock(®ulator_list_mutex);
|
||||
rdev = regulator->rdev;
|
||||
|
||||
if (WARN(regulator->enabled, "Releasing supply %s while enabled\n",
|
||||
regulator->supply_name))
|
||||
_regulator_disable(rdev);
|
||||
|
||||
/* remove any sysfs entries */
|
||||
if (regulator->dev) {
|
||||
sysfs_remove_link(&rdev->dev.kobj, regulator->supply_name);
|
||||
|
@ -1146,12 +1142,7 @@ int regulator_enable(struct regulator *regulator)
|
|||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
|
||||
if (regulator->enabled == 0)
|
||||
ret = _regulator_enable(rdev);
|
||||
else if (regulator->enabled < 0)
|
||||
ret = -EIO;
|
||||
if (ret == 0)
|
||||
regulator->enabled++;
|
||||
ret = _regulator_enable(rdev);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1162,6 +1153,11 @@ static int _regulator_disable(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
|
|||
{
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (WARN(rdev->use_count <= 0,
|
||||
"unbalanced disables for %s\n",
|
||||
rdev->desc->name))
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
|
||||
/* are we the last user and permitted to disable ? */
|
||||
if (rdev->use_count == 1 && !rdev->constraints->always_on) {
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1210,16 +1206,7 @@ int regulator_disable(struct regulator *regulator)
|
|||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
|
||||
if (regulator->enabled == 1) {
|
||||
ret = _regulator_disable(rdev);
|
||||
if (ret == 0)
|
||||
regulator->uA_load = 0;
|
||||
} else if (WARN(regulator->enabled <= 0,
|
||||
"unbalanced disables for supply %s\n",
|
||||
regulator->supply_name))
|
||||
ret = -EIO;
|
||||
if (ret == 0)
|
||||
regulator->enabled--;
|
||||
ret = _regulator_disable(rdev);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&rdev->mutex);
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -1266,7 +1253,6 @@ int regulator_force_disable(struct regulator *regulator)
|
|||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(®ulator->rdev->mutex);
|
||||
regulator->enabled = 0;
|
||||
regulator->uA_load = 0;
|
||||
ret = _regulator_force_disable(regulator->rdev);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(®ulator->rdev->mutex);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue