[PATCH] unnecessary long index i in sched
Unless we expect to have more than 2G CPUs, there's no reason to have 'i' as a long long here. Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
72d2854d4e
commit
cc94abfcbc
|
@ -1653,7 +1653,8 @@ unsigned long nr_uninterruptible(void)
|
|||
|
||||
unsigned long long nr_context_switches(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unsigned long long i, sum = 0;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
unsigned long long sum = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
for_each_possible_cpu(i)
|
||||
sum += cpu_rq(i)->nr_switches;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue