freescale: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293
("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
040efdb14c
commit
cc5b48b567
|
@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ struct enetc_int_vector {
|
|||
char name[ENETC_INT_NAME_MAX];
|
||||
|
||||
struct enetc_bdr rx_ring ____cacheline_aligned_in_smp;
|
||||
struct enetc_bdr tx_ring[0];
|
||||
struct enetc_bdr tx_ring[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct enetc_cls_rule {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ struct tgs_gcl_data {
|
|||
__le32 bth;
|
||||
__le32 ct;
|
||||
__le32 cte;
|
||||
struct gce entry[0];
|
||||
struct gce entry[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct enetc_cbd {
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -584,7 +584,7 @@ struct fec_enet_private {
|
|||
int pps_enable;
|
||||
unsigned int next_counter;
|
||||
|
||||
u64 ethtool_stats[0];
|
||||
u64 ethtool_stats[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
void fec_ptp_init(struct platform_device *pdev, int irq_idx);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue