x86/apic: Fix num_processors value in case of failure
If the topology package map check of the APIC ID and the CPU is a failure, we don't generate the processor info for that APIC ID yet we increase disabled_cpus by one - which is buggy. Only increase num_processors once we are sure we don't fail. Signed-off-by: Dou Liyang <douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com> Acked-by: David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1473214893-16481-1-git-send-email-douly.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com [ Rewrote the changelog. ] Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
db91e2370e
commit
c291b01515
|
@ -2093,7 +2093,6 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
|
|||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
num_processors++;
|
||||
if (apicid == boot_cpu_physical_apicid) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* x86_bios_cpu_apicid is required to have processors listed
|
||||
|
@ -2116,10 +2115,13 @@ int generic_processor_info(int apicid, int version)
|
|||
|
||||
pr_warning("APIC: Package limit reached. Processor %d/0x%x ignored.\n",
|
||||
thiscpu, apicid);
|
||||
|
||||
disabled_cpus++;
|
||||
return -ENOSPC;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
num_processors++;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Validate version
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue