V4L/DVB: IR: let all protocol decoders have a go at raw data
On Fri, May 28, 2010 at 3:59 PM, Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> wrote: > The mceusb driver I'm about to submit handles just about any raw IR you > can throw at it. The ir-core loads up all protocol decoders, starting > with NEC, then RC5, then RC6. RUN_DECODER() was trying them in the same > order, and exiting if any of the decoders didn't like the data. The > default mceusb remote talks RC6(6A). Well, the RC6 decoder never gets a > chance to run unless you move the RC6 decoder to the front of the list. > > What I believe to be correct is to have RUN_DECODER keep trying all of > the decoders, even when one triggers an error. I don't think the errors > matter so much as it matters that at least one was successful -- i.e., > that _sumrc is > 0. The following works for me w/my mceusb driver and > the default decoder ordering -- NEC and RC5 still fail, but RC6 still > gets a crack at it, and successfully does its job. > > Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> > > --- > drivers/media/IR/ir-raw-event.c | 7 ++++--- > > diff --git a/drivers/media/IR/ir-raw-event.c b/drivers/media/IR/ir-raw-event.c > index ea68a3f..44162db 100644 > --- a/drivers/media/IR/ir-raw-event.c > +++ b/drivers/media/IR/ir-raw-event.c > @@ -36,14 +36,15 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ir_raw_handler_lock); > */ > #define RUN_DECODER(ops, ...) ({ \ > struct ir_raw_handler *_ir_raw_handler; \ > - int _sumrc = 0, _rc; \ > + int _sumrc = 0, _rc, _fail; \ > spin_lock(&ir_raw_handler_lock); \ > list_for_each_entry(_ir_raw_handler, &ir_raw_handler_list, list) { \ > if (_ir_raw_handler->ops) { \ > _rc = _ir_raw_handler->ops(__VA_ARGS__); \ > if (_rc < 0) \ > - break; \ > - _sumrc += _rc; \ > + _fail++; \ > + else \ > + _sumrc += _rc; \ Self-NAK. The only place we actually *care* about the retval from a RUN_DECODER() call is in __ir_input_register(), and currently, its looking for retval < 0, which is currently never possible. When we're running the decoders, either they fail and return -EINVAL or they succeed and return 0, and in the register case, we get either a negative error (ex: -ENOMEM from rc6) or 0, so with the above, _sumrc will *always* be 0 in the two cases I'm looking at. The third place where RUN_DECODER gets called (decoder unregister) doesn't care about the retval either. New patch below, including updated comments about the macro. Signed-off-by: Jarod Wilson <jarod@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
52e0a72a0c
commit
c228426111
|
@ -31,8 +31,9 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ir_raw_handler_lock);
|
||||||
*
|
*
|
||||||
* Calls ir_raw_handler::ops for all registered IR handlers. It prevents
|
* Calls ir_raw_handler::ops for all registered IR handlers. It prevents
|
||||||
* new decode addition/removal while running, by locking ir_raw_handler_lock
|
* new decode addition/removal while running, by locking ir_raw_handler_lock
|
||||||
* mutex. If an error occurs, it stops the ops. Otherwise, it returns a sum
|
* mutex. If an error occurs, we keep going, as in the decode case, each
|
||||||
* of the return codes.
|
* decoder must have a crack at decoding the data. We return a sum of the
|
||||||
|
* return codes, which will be either 0 or negative for current callers.
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
#define RUN_DECODER(ops, ...) ({ \
|
#define RUN_DECODER(ops, ...) ({ \
|
||||||
struct ir_raw_handler *_ir_raw_handler; \
|
struct ir_raw_handler *_ir_raw_handler; \
|
||||||
|
@ -41,8 +42,6 @@ static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ir_raw_handler_lock);
|
||||||
list_for_each_entry(_ir_raw_handler, &ir_raw_handler_list, list) { \
|
list_for_each_entry(_ir_raw_handler, &ir_raw_handler_list, list) { \
|
||||||
if (_ir_raw_handler->ops) { \
|
if (_ir_raw_handler->ops) { \
|
||||||
_rc = _ir_raw_handler->ops(__VA_ARGS__); \
|
_rc = _ir_raw_handler->ops(__VA_ARGS__); \
|
||||||
if (_rc < 0) \
|
|
||||||
break; \
|
|
||||||
_sumrc += _rc; \
|
_sumrc += _rc; \
|
||||||
} \
|
} \
|
||||||
} \
|
} \
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue