btrfs: tree-checker: Make btrfs_check_chunk_valid() return EUCLEAN instead of EIO
To follow the standard behavior of tree-checker. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f114024376
commit
bf871c3b43
|
@ -496,7 +496,7 @@ static void chunk_err(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* The common chunk check which could also work on super block sys chunk array.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Return -EIO if anything is corrupted.
|
||||
* Return -EUCLEAN if anything is corrupted.
|
||||
* Return 0 if everything is OK.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
|
@ -520,31 +520,31 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
if (!num_stripes) {
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk num_stripes, have %u", num_stripes);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!IS_ALIGNED(logical, fs_info->sectorsize)) {
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk logical, have %llu should aligned to %u",
|
||||
logical, fs_info->sectorsize);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk) != fs_info->sectorsize) {
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk sectorsize, have %u expect %u",
|
||||
btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk),
|
||||
fs_info->sectorsize);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!length || !IS_ALIGNED(length, fs_info->sectorsize)) {
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk length, have %llu", length);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!is_power_of_2(stripe_len) || stripe_len != BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN) {
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk stripe length: %llu",
|
||||
stripe_len);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
|
||||
type) {
|
||||
|
@ -553,14 +553,14 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK |
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
|
||||
btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk));
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) {
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"missing chunk type flag, have 0x%llx one bit must be set in 0x%llx",
|
||||
type, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) &&
|
||||
|
@ -568,7 +568,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"system chunk with data or metadata type: 0x%llx",
|
||||
type);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
features = btrfs_super_incompat_flags(fs_info->super_copy);
|
||||
|
@ -580,7 +580,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: 0x%llx", type);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -594,7 +594,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
"invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu",
|
||||
num_stripes, sub_stripes,
|
||||
type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
return -EUCLEAN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue