workqueue: Fix spelling in source code comments
Change "execuing" into "executing" and "guarnateed" into "guaranteed". Cc: Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org> Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8bdc620178
commit
bf393fd4a3
|
@ -1321,7 +1321,7 @@ static bool is_chained_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq)
|
|||
|
||||
worker = current_wq_worker();
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Return %true iff I'm a worker execuing a work item on @wq. If
|
||||
* Return %true iff I'm a worker executing a work item on @wq. If
|
||||
* I'm @worker, it's safe to dereference it without locking.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return worker && worker->current_pwq->wq == wq;
|
||||
|
@ -1619,7 +1619,7 @@ static void rcu_work_rcufn(struct rcu_head *rcu)
|
|||
*
|
||||
* Return: %false if @rwork was already pending, %true otherwise. Note
|
||||
* that a full RCU grace period is guaranteed only after a %true return.
|
||||
* While @rwork is guarnateed to be executed after a %false return, the
|
||||
* While @rwork is guaranteed to be executed after a %false return, the
|
||||
* execution may happen before a full RCU grace period has passed.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
bool queue_rcu_work(struct workqueue_struct *wq, struct rcu_work *rwork)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue