ocfs2/dlm: ignore cleaning the migration mle that is inuse
We have found that migration source will trigger a BUG that the refcount of mle is already zero before put when the target is down during migration. The situation is as follows: dlm_migrate_lockres dlm_add_migration_mle dlm_mark_lockres_migrating dlm_get_mle_inuse <<<<<< Now the refcount of the mle is 2. dlm_send_one_lockres and wait for the target to become the new master. <<<<<< o2hb detect the target down and clean the migration mle. Now the refcount is 1. dlm_migrate_lockres woken, and put the mle twice when found the target goes down which trigger the BUG with the following message: "ERROR: bad mle: ". Signed-off-by: Jiufei Xue <xuejiufei@huawei.com> Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@huawei.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@suse.de> Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@evilplan.org> Cc: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@oracle.com> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1cce4df04f
commit
bef5502de0
|
@ -2519,6 +2519,11 @@ static int dlm_migrate_lockres(struct dlm_ctxt *dlm,
|
|||
spin_lock(&dlm->master_lock);
|
||||
ret = dlm_add_migration_mle(dlm, res, mle, &oldmle, name,
|
||||
namelen, target, dlm->node_num);
|
||||
/* get an extra reference on the mle.
|
||||
* otherwise the assert_master from the new
|
||||
* master will destroy this.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
dlm_get_mle_inuse(mle);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dlm->master_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2554,6 +2559,7 @@ fail:
|
|||
if (mle_added) {
|
||||
dlm_mle_detach_hb_events(dlm, mle);
|
||||
dlm_put_mle(mle);
|
||||
dlm_put_mle_inuse(mle);
|
||||
} else if (mle) {
|
||||
kmem_cache_free(dlm_mle_cache, mle);
|
||||
mle = NULL;
|
||||
|
@ -2571,17 +2577,6 @@ fail:
|
|||
* ensure that all assert_master work is flushed. */
|
||||
flush_workqueue(dlm->dlm_worker);
|
||||
|
||||
/* get an extra reference on the mle.
|
||||
* otherwise the assert_master from the new
|
||||
* master will destroy this.
|
||||
* also, make sure that all callers of dlm_get_mle
|
||||
* take both dlm->spinlock and dlm->master_lock */
|
||||
spin_lock(&dlm->spinlock);
|
||||
spin_lock(&dlm->master_lock);
|
||||
dlm_get_mle_inuse(mle);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dlm->master_lock);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dlm->spinlock);
|
||||
|
||||
/* notify new node and send all lock state */
|
||||
/* call send_one_lockres with migration flag.
|
||||
* this serves as notice to the target node that a
|
||||
|
@ -3312,6 +3307,15 @@ top:
|
|||
mle->new_master != dead_node)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (mle->new_master == dead_node && mle->inuse) {
|
||||
mlog(ML_NOTICE, "%s: target %u died during "
|
||||
"migration from %u, the MLE is "
|
||||
"still keep used, ignore it!\n",
|
||||
dlm->name, dead_node,
|
||||
mle->master);
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If we have reached this point, this mle needs to be
|
||||
* removed from the list and freed. */
|
||||
dlm_clean_migration_mle(dlm, mle);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue