staging:rtl8192u: Rename EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 - Style
Rename the constant EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 to EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK_V1, this clears the checkpatch issue with CamelCase naming. This is purely a coding style change which should have no impact on runtime code execution. Signed-off-by: John Whitmore <johnfwhitmore@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e9034dd6e1
commit
be9bd9d5a7
|
@ -2498,7 +2498,7 @@ static int rtl8192_read_eeprom_info(struct net_device *dev)
|
|||
}
|
||||
} else if (priv->EEPROM_Def_Ver == 1) {
|
||||
if (bLoad_From_EEPOM) {
|
||||
ret = eprom_read(dev, EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 >> 1);
|
||||
ret = eprom_read(dev, EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK_V1 >> 1);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
tmpValue = ((u16)ret & 0xff00) >> 8;
|
||||
|
@ -2508,7 +2508,7 @@ static int rtl8192_read_eeprom_info(struct net_device *dev)
|
|||
priv->EEPROMTxPowerLevelCCK_V1[0] = (u8)tmpValue;
|
||||
|
||||
if (bLoad_From_EEPOM) {
|
||||
ret = eprom_read(dev, (EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 + 2) >> 1);
|
||||
ret = eprom_read(dev, (EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK_V1 + 2) >> 1);
|
||||
if (ret < 0)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
tmpValue = (u16)ret;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK 0x23 //0x23
|
||||
#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G 0x24 //0x24~0x26
|
||||
#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_CCK_V1 0x29 //0x29~0x2B
|
||||
#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_CCK_V1 0x29 //0x29~0x2B
|
||||
#define EEPROM_TX_PW_INDEX_OFDM_24G_V1 0x2C //0x2C~0x2E
|
||||
#define EEPROM_TxPwIndex_Ver 0x27 //0x27
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue