From d6752e185c3168771787a02dc6a55f32260943cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Stephen Boyd Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2019 11:51:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] rtc: cros-ec: Fail suspend/resume if wake IRQ can't be configured If we encounter a failure during suspend where this RTC was programmed to wakeup the system from suspend, but that wakeup couldn't be configured because the system didn't support wakeup interrupts, we'll run into the following warning: Unbalanced IRQ 166 wake disable WARNING: CPU: 7 PID: 3071 at kernel/irq/manage.c:669 irq_set_irq_wake+0x108/0x278 This happens because the suspend process isn't aborted when the RTC fails to configure the wakeup IRQ. Instead, we continue suspending the system and then another suspend callback fails the suspend process and "unwinds" the previously suspended drivers by calling their resume callbacks. When we get back to resuming this RTC driver, we'll call disable_irq_wake() on an IRQ that hasn't been configured for wake. Let's just fail suspend/resume here if we can't configure the system to wake and the user has chosen to wakeup with this device. This fixes this warning and makes the code more robust in case there are systems out there that can't wakeup from suspend on this line but the user has chosen to do so. Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra Cc: Evan Green Cc: Benson Leung Cc: Guenter Roeck Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd Acked-By: Benson Leung Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c index e5444296075e..4d6bf9304ceb 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-cros-ec.c @@ -298,7 +298,7 @@ static int cros_ec_rtc_suspend(struct device *dev) struct cros_ec_rtc *cros_ec_rtc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) - enable_irq_wake(cros_ec_rtc->cros_ec->irq); + return enable_irq_wake(cros_ec_rtc->cros_ec->irq); return 0; } @@ -309,7 +309,7 @@ static int cros_ec_rtc_resume(struct device *dev) struct cros_ec_rtc *cros_ec_rtc = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev); if (device_may_wakeup(dev)) - disable_irq_wake(cros_ec_rtc->cros_ec->irq); + return disable_irq_wake(cros_ec_rtc->cros_ec->irq); return 0; } From 15d82d22498784966df8e4696174a16b02cc1052 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Geert Uytterhoeven Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 11:32:14 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] rtc: sh: Fix invalid alarm warning for non-enabled alarm When no alarm has been programmed on RSK-RZA1, an error message is printed during boot: rtc rtc0: invalid alarm value: 2019-03-14T255:255:255 sh_rtc_read_alarm_value() returns 0xff when querying a hardware alarm field that is not enabled. __rtc_read_alarm() validates the received alarm values, and fills in missing fields when needed. While 0xff is handled fine for the year, month, and day fields, and corrected as considered being out-of-range, this is not the case for the hour, minute, and second fields, where -1 is expected for missing fields. Fix this by returning -1 instead, as this value is handled fine for all fields. Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c index d417b203cbc5..1d3de2a3d1a4 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-sh.c @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ static int sh_rtc_set_time(struct device *dev, struct rtc_time *tm) static inline int sh_rtc_read_alarm_value(struct sh_rtc *rtc, int reg_off) { unsigned int byte; - int value = 0xff; /* return 0xff for ignored values */ + int value = -1; /* return -1 for ignored values */ byte = readb(rtc->regbase + reg_off); if (byte & AR_ENB) { From 22e7d5148d9a0b2e5bd20913f55cce89b58cd990 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandre Belloni Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2019 13:10:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] rtc: sd3078: fix manufacturer name The proper manufacturer name is Shenzhen whwave. Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig index a71734c41693..f933c06bff4f 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig @@ -667,9 +667,9 @@ config RTC_DRV_S5M will be called rtc-s5m. config RTC_DRV_SD3078 - tristate "ZXW Crystal SD3078" + tristate "ZXW Shenzhen whwave SD3078" help - If you say yes here you get support for the ZXW Crystal + If you say yes here you get support for the ZXW Shenzhen whwave SD3078 RTC chips. This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module From 882c5e552ffd06856de42261460f46e18319d259 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Alexandre Belloni Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2019 12:26:36 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] rtc: da9063: set uie_unsupported when relevant The DA9063AD doesn't support alarms on any seconds and its granularity is the minute. Set uie_unsupported in that case. Reported-by: Wolfram Sang Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven Reviewed-by: Wolfram Sang Tested-by: Wolfram Sang Acked-by: Steve Twiss Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni --- drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c index b4e054c64bad..69b54e5556c0 100644 --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-da9063.c @@ -480,6 +480,13 @@ static int da9063_rtc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) da9063_data_to_tm(data, &rtc->alarm_time, rtc); rtc->rtc_sync = false; + /* + * TODO: some models have alarms on a minute boundary but still support + * real hardware interrupts. Add this once the core supports it. + */ + if (config->rtc_data_start != RTC_SEC) + rtc->rtc_dev->uie_unsupported = 1; + irq_alarm = platform_get_irq_byname(pdev, "ALARM"); ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, irq_alarm, NULL, da9063_alarm_event,