abx500_chargalg: Reorder obtainment of platform specific battery management data
Now that we always pass platform specific battery management data through platform_data instead of obtaining it via different means depending the way be boot the system (DT or ATAGs); we need to re-jiggle the way we acquire it in the driver start-up functions. Now it is wrong for it to be missing, but we still allow Device Tree code to fiddle with it once we've confirmed it's there. Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
195c1c660c
commit
bdc56b4403
|
@ -1806,6 +1806,7 @@ static char *supply_interface[] = {
|
|||
static int __devinit abx500_chargalg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct device_node *np = pdev->dev.of_node;
|
||||
struct abx500_bm_data *plat = pdev->dev.platform_data;
|
||||
struct abx500_chargalg *di;
|
||||
int ret = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1814,21 +1815,19 @@ static int __devinit abx500_chargalg_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
|
|||
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "%s no mem for ab8500_chargalg\n", __func__);
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
di->bm = pdev->mfd_cell->platform_data;
|
||||
if (!di->bm) {
|
||||
if (np) {
|
||||
ret = ab8500_bm_of_probe(&pdev->dev, np, di->bm);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
dev_err(&pdev->dev,
|
||||
"failed to get battery information\n");
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "missing dt node for ab8500_chargalg\n");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!plat) {
|
||||
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no battery management data supplied\n");
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
di->bm = plat;
|
||||
|
||||
if (np) {
|
||||
ret = ab8500_bm_of_probe(&pdev->dev, np, di->bm);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to get battery information\n");
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
dev_info(&pdev->dev, "falling back to legacy platform data\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* get device struct */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue