doc: rcu: Remove obsolete suggestion from checklist
call_rcu_bh is now implemented in terms of call_rcu, so the suggestion to use a different API for speed benefits is not accurate anymore. This commit updates the document accordingly. Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
090c1685fd
commit
bc2072c9ad
|
@ -285,11 +285,7 @@ over a rather long period of time, but improvements are always welcome!
|
|||
here is that superuser already has lots of ways to crash
|
||||
the machine.
|
||||
|
||||
d. Use call_rcu_bh() rather than call_rcu(), in order to take
|
||||
advantage of call_rcu_bh()'s faster grace periods. (This
|
||||
is only a partial solution, though.)
|
||||
|
||||
e. Periodically invoke synchronize_rcu(), permitting a limited
|
||||
d. Periodically invoke synchronize_rcu(), permitting a limited
|
||||
number of updates per grace period.
|
||||
|
||||
The same cautions apply to call_rcu_bh(), call_rcu_sched(),
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue