From 9f7fec0ba89108b9385f1b9fb167861224912a4a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2019 13:08:52 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Btrfs: fix selftests failure due to uninitialized i_mode in test inodes Some of the self tests create a test inode, setup some extents and then do calls to btrfs_get_extent() to test that the corresponding extent maps exist and are correct. However btrfs_get_extent(), since the 5.2 merge window, now errors out when it finds a regular or prealloc extent for an inode that does not correspond to a regular file (its ->i_mode is not S_IFREG). This causes the self tests to fail sometimes, specially when KASAN, slub_debug and page poisoning are enabled: $ modprobe btrfs modprobe: ERROR: could not insert 'btrfs': Invalid argument $ dmesg [ 9414.691648] Btrfs loaded, crc32c=crc32c-intel, debug=on, assert=on, integrity-checker=on, ref-verify=on [ 9414.692655] BTRFS: selftest: sectorsize: 4096 nodesize: 4096 [ 9414.692658] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs free space cache tests [ 9414.692918] BTRFS: selftest: running extent only tests [ 9414.693061] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap only tests [ 9414.693366] BTRFS: selftest: running bitmap and extent tests [ 9414.696455] BTRFS: selftest: running space stealing from bitmap to extent tests [ 9414.697131] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer operation tests [ 9414.697133] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_split_item tests [ 9414.697564] BTRFS: selftest: running extent I/O tests [ 9414.697583] BTRFS: selftest: running find delalloc tests [ 9415.081125] BTRFS: selftest: running find_first_clear_extent_bit test [ 9415.081278] BTRFS: selftest: running extent buffer bitmap tests [ 9415.124192] BTRFS: selftest: running inode tests [ 9415.124195] BTRFS: selftest: running btrfs_get_extent tests [ 9415.127909] BTRFS: selftest: running hole first btrfs_get_extent test [ 9415.128343] BTRFS critical (device (efault)): regular/prealloc extent found for non-regular inode 256 [ 9415.131428] BTRFS: selftest: fs/btrfs/tests/inode-tests.c:904 expected a real extent, got 0 This happens because the test inodes are created without ever initializing the i_mode field of the inode, and neither VFS's new_inode() nor the btrfs callback btrfs_alloc_inode() initialize the i_mode. Initialization of the i_mode is done through the various callbacks used by the VFS to create new inodes (regular files, directories, symlinks, tmpfiles, etc), which all call btrfs_new_inode() which in turn calls inode_init_owner(), which sets the inode's i_mode. Since the tests only uses new_inode() to create the test inodes, the i_mode was never initialized. This always happens on a VM I used with kasan, slub_debug and many other debug facilities enabled. It also happened to someone who reported this on bugzilla (on a 5.3-rc). Fix this by setting i_mode to S_IFREG at btrfs_new_test_inode(). Fixes: 6bf9e4bd6a2778 ("btrfs: inode: Verify inode mode to avoid NULL pointer dereference") Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204397 Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Reviewed-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c index b5e80563efaa..99fe9bf3fdac 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/tests/btrfs-tests.c @@ -52,7 +52,13 @@ static struct file_system_type test_type = { struct inode *btrfs_new_test_inode(void) { - return new_inode(test_mnt->mnt_sb); + struct inode *inode; + + inode = new_inode(test_mnt->mnt_sb); + if (inode) + inode_init_owner(inode, NULL, S_IFREG); + + return inode; } static int btrfs_init_test_fs(void) From eb5b64f142504a597d67e2109d603055ff765e52 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Zhou Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2019 14:54:07 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 2/8] btrfs: adjust dirty_metadata_bytes after writeback failure of extent buffer Before, if a eb failed to write out, we would end up triggering a BUG_ON(). As of f4340622e0226 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in flush_write_bio() one level up"), we no longer BUG_ON(), so we should make life consistent and add back the unwritten bytes to dirty_metadata_bytes. Fixes: f4340622e022 ("btrfs: extent_io: Move the BUG_ON() in flush_write_bio() one level up") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.2+ Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Dennis Zhou Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 4dc5e6939856..67066ece4de3 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -3728,11 +3728,20 @@ static void end_extent_buffer_writeback(struct extent_buffer *eb) static void set_btree_ioerr(struct page *page) { struct extent_buffer *eb = (struct extent_buffer *)page->private; + struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info; SetPageError(page); if (test_and_set_bit(EXTENT_BUFFER_WRITE_ERR, &eb->bflags)) return; + /* + * If we error out, we should add back the dirty_metadata_bytes + * to make it consistent. + */ + fs_info = eb->fs_info; + percpu_counter_add_batch(&fs_info->dirty_metadata_bytes, + eb->len, fs_info->dirty_metadata_batch); + /* * If writeback for a btree extent that doesn't belong to a log tree * failed, increment the counter transaction->eb_write_errors. From 0607eb1d452d45c5ac4c745a9e9e0d95152ea9d0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2019 17:42:28 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 3/8] Btrfs: fix missing error return if writeback for extent buffer never started If lock_extent_buffer_for_io() fails, it returns a negative value, but its caller btree_write_cache_pages() ignores such error. This means that a call to flush_write_bio(), from lock_extent_buffer_for_io(), might have failed. We should make btree_write_cache_pages() notice such error values and stop immediatelly, making sure filemap_fdatawrite_range() returns an error to the transaction commit path. A failure from flush_write_bio() should also result in the endio callback end_bio_extent_buffer_writepage() being invoked, which sets the BTRFS_FS_*_ERR bits appropriately, so that there's no risk a transaction or log commit doesn't catch a writeback failure. Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/extent_io.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c index 67066ece4de3..380ced84d4b1 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/extent_io.c @@ -3978,6 +3978,10 @@ retry: if (!ret) { free_extent_buffer(eb); continue; + } else if (ret < 0) { + done = 1; + free_extent_buffer(eb); + break; } ret = write_one_eb(eb, wbc, &epd); From 13fc1d271a2e3ab8a02071e711add01fab9271f6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Filipe Manana Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2019 10:49:54 +0100 Subject: [PATCH 4/8] Btrfs: fix race setting up and completing qgroup rescan workers There is a race between setting up a qgroup rescan worker and completing a qgroup rescan worker that can lead to callers of the qgroup rescan wait ioctl to either not wait for the rescan worker to complete or to hang forever due to missing wake ups. The following diagram shows a sequence of steps that illustrates the race. CPU 1 CPU 2 CPU 3 btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() btrfs_qgroup_rescan() qgroup_rescan_init() mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock) spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock) fs_info->qgroup_flags |= BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN init_completion( &fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion) fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = true mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock) spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock) btrfs_init_work() --> starts the worker btrfs_qgroup_rescan_worker() mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock) fs_info->qgroup_flags &= ~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock) starts transaction, updates qgroup status item, etc btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan() btrfs_qgroup_rescan() qgroup_rescan_init() mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock) spin_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock) fs_info->qgroup_flags |= BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN init_completion( &fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion) fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = true mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock) spin_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_lock) btrfs_init_work() --> starts another worker mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock) fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = false mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock) complete_all(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion) Before the rescan worker started by the task at CPU 3 completes, if another task calls btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan(), it will get -EINPROGRESS because the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN is set at fs_info->qgroup_flags, which is expected and correct behaviour. However if other task calls btrfs_ioctl_quota_rescan_wait() before the rescan worker started by the task at CPU 3 completes, it will return immediately without waiting for the new rescan worker to complete, because fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running is set to false by CPU 2. This race is making test case btrfs/171 (from fstests) to fail often: btrfs/171 9s ... - output mismatch (see /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad) --- tests/btrfs/171.out 2018-09-16 21:30:48.505104287 +0100 +++ /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad 2019-09-19 02:01:36.938486039 +0100 @@ -1,2 +1,3 @@ QA output created by 171 +ERROR: quota rescan failed: Operation now in progress Silence is golden ... (Run 'diff -u /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/tests/btrfs/171.out /home/fdmanana/git/hub/xfstests/results//btrfs/171.out.bad' to see the entire diff) That is because the test calls the btrfs-progs commands "qgroup quota rescan -w", "qgroup assign" and "qgroup remove" in a sequence that makes calls to the rescan start ioctl fail with -EINPROGRESS (note the "btrfs" commands 'qgroup assign' and 'qgroup remove' often call the rescan start ioctl after calling the qgroup assign ioctl, btrfs_ioctl_qgroup_assign()), since previous waits didn't actually wait for a rescan worker to complete. Another problem the race can cause is missing wake ups for waiters, since the call to complete_all() happens outside a critical section and after clearing the flag BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN. In the sequence diagram above, if we have a waiter for the first rescan task (executed by CPU 2), then fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion.wait is not empty, and if after the rescan worker clears BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN and before it calls complete_all() against fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion, the task at CPU 3 calls init_completion() against fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion which re-initilizes its wait queue to an empty queue, therefore causing the rescan worker at CPU 2 to call complete_all() against an empty queue, never waking up the task waiting for that rescan worker. Fix this by clearing BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN and setting fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running to false in the same critical section, delimited by the mutex fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock, as well as doing the call to complete_all() in that same critical section. This gives the protection needed to avoid rescan wait ioctl callers not waiting for a running rescan worker and the lost wake ups problem, since setting that rescan flag and boolean as well as initializing the wait queue is done already in a critical section delimited by that mutex (at qgroup_rescan_init()). Fixes: 57254b6ebce4ce ("Btrfs: add ioctl to wait for qgroup rescan completion") Fixes: d2c609b834d62f ("btrfs: properly track when rescan worker is running") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Signed-off-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 8d3bd799ac7d..52701c1be109 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -3166,9 +3166,6 @@ out: btrfs_free_path(path); mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock); - if (!btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info)) - fs_info->qgroup_flags &= ~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN; - if (err > 0 && fs_info->qgroup_flags & BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_INCONSISTENT) { fs_info->qgroup_flags &= ~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_INCONSISTENT; @@ -3184,16 +3181,30 @@ out: trans = btrfs_start_transaction(fs_info->quota_root, 1); if (IS_ERR(trans)) { err = PTR_ERR(trans); + trans = NULL; btrfs_err(fs_info, "fail to start transaction for status update: %d", err); - goto done; } - ret = update_qgroup_status_item(trans); - if (ret < 0) { - err = ret; - btrfs_err(fs_info, "fail to update qgroup status: %d", err); + + mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock); + if (!btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info)) + fs_info->qgroup_flags &= ~BTRFS_QGROUP_STATUS_FLAG_RESCAN; + if (trans) { + ret = update_qgroup_status_item(trans); + if (ret < 0) { + err = ret; + btrfs_err(fs_info, "fail to update qgroup status: %d", + err); + } } + fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = false; + complete_all(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion); + mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock); + + if (!trans) + return; + btrfs_end_transaction(trans); if (btrfs_fs_closing(fs_info)) { @@ -3204,12 +3215,6 @@ out: } else { btrfs_err(fs_info, "qgroup scan failed with %d", err); } - -done: - mutex_lock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock); - fs_info->qgroup_rescan_running = false; - mutex_unlock(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_lock); - complete_all(&fs_info->qgroup_rescan_completion); } /* From 1fac4a54374f7ef385938f3c6cf7649c0fe4f6cd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 14:56:14 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 5/8] btrfs: relocation: fix use-after-free on dead relocation roots [BUG] One user reported a reproducible KASAN report about use-after-free: BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: start -dvrange=1256811659264..1256811659265 BTRFS info (device sdi1): relocating block group 1256811659264 flags data|raid0 ================================================================== BUG: KASAN: use-after-free in btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] Write of size 8 at addr ffff88856f671710 by task kworker/u24:10/261579 CPU: 2 PID: 261579 Comm: kworker/u24:10 Tainted: P OE 5.2.11-arch1-1-kasan #4 Hardware name: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M./X99 Extreme4, BIOS P3.80 04/06/2018 Workqueue: btrfs-endio-write btrfs_endio_write_helper [btrfs] Call Trace: dump_stack+0x7b/0xba print_address_description+0x6c/0x22e ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] __kasan_report.cold+0x1b/0x3b ? btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] kasan_report+0x12/0x17 __asan_report_store8_noabort+0x17/0x20 btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x2cd/0x340 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs] btrfs_join_transaction+0x1d/0x20 [btrfs] btrfs_finish_ordered_io+0x7bf/0x18a0 [btrfs] ? lock_repin_lock+0x400/0x400 ? __kmem_cache_shutdown.cold+0x140/0x1ad ? btrfs_unlink_subvol+0x9b0/0x9b0 [btrfs] finish_ordered_fn+0x15/0x20 [btrfs] normal_work_helper+0x1bd/0xca0 [btrfs] ? process_one_work+0x819/0x1720 ? kasan_check_read+0x11/0x20 btrfs_endio_write_helper+0x12/0x20 [btrfs] process_one_work+0x8c9/0x1720 ? pwq_dec_nr_in_flight+0x2f0/0x2f0 ? worker_thread+0x1d9/0x1030 worker_thread+0x98/0x1030 kthread+0x2bb/0x3b0 ? process_one_work+0x1720/0x1720 ? kthread_park+0x120/0x120 ret_from_fork+0x35/0x40 Allocated by task 369692: __kasan_kmalloc.part.0+0x44/0xc0 __kasan_kmalloc.constprop.0+0xba/0xc0 kasan_kmalloc+0x9/0x10 kmem_cache_alloc_trace+0x138/0x260 btrfs_read_tree_root+0x92/0x360 [btrfs] btrfs_read_fs_root+0x10/0xb0 [btrfs] create_reloc_root+0x47d/0xa10 [btrfs] btrfs_init_reloc_root+0x1e2/0x340 [btrfs] record_root_in_trans+0x2a0/0x370 [btrfs] btrfs_record_root_in_trans+0xf4/0x140 [btrfs] start_transaction+0x1ab/0xe90 [btrfs] btrfs_start_transaction+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs] __btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x1c2/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_prealloc_file_range+0x13/0x20 [btrfs] prealloc_file_extent_cluster+0x29f/0x570 [btrfs] relocate_file_extent_cluster+0x193/0xc30 [btrfs] relocate_data_extent+0x1f8/0x490 [btrfs] relocate_block_group+0x600/0x1060 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 Freed by task 369692: __kasan_slab_free+0x14f/0x210 kasan_slab_free+0xe/0x10 kfree+0xd8/0x270 btrfs_drop_snapshot+0x154c/0x1eb0 [btrfs] clean_dirty_subvols+0x227/0x340 [btrfs] relocate_block_group+0x972/0x1060 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_block_group+0x3a0/0xa00 [btrfs] btrfs_relocate_chunk+0x9e/0x180 [btrfs] btrfs_balance+0x14e4/0x2fc0 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x47f/0x640 [btrfs] btrfs_ioctl+0x119d/0x8380 [btrfs] do_vfs_ioctl+0x9f5/0x1060 ksys_ioctl+0x67/0x90 __x64_sys_ioctl+0x73/0xb0 do_syscall_64+0xa5/0x370 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9 The buggy address belongs to the object at ffff88856f671100 which belongs to the cache kmalloc-4k of size 4096 The buggy address is located 1552 bytes inside of 4096-byte region [ffff88856f671100, ffff88856f672100) The buggy address belongs to the page: page:ffffea0015bd9c00 refcount:1 mapcount:0 mapping:ffff88864400e600 index:0x0 compound_mapcount: 0 flags: 0x2ffff0000010200(slab|head) raw: 02ffff0000010200 dead000000000100 dead000000000200 ffff88864400e600 raw: 0000000000000000 0000000000070007 00000001ffffffff 0000000000000000 page dumped because: kasan: bad access detected Memory state around the buggy address: ffff88856f671600: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff88856f671680: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb >ffff88856f671700: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ^ ffff88856f671780: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ffff88856f671800: fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb fb ================================================================== BTRFS info (device sdi1): 1 enospc errors during balance BTRFS info (device sdi1): balance: ended with status: -28 [CAUSE] The problem happens when finish_ordered_io() get called with balance still running, while the reloc root of that subvolume is already dead. (Tree is swap already done, but tree not yet deleted for possible qgroup usage.) That means root->reloc_root still exists, but that reloc_root can be under btrfs_drop_snapshot(), thus we shouldn't access it. The following race could cause the use-after-free problem: CPU1 | CPU2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | relocate_block_group() | |- unset_reloc_control(rc) | |- btrfs_commit_transaction() btrfs_finish_ordered_io() | |- clean_dirty_subvols() |- btrfs_join_transaction() | | |- record_root_in_trans() | | |- btrfs_init_reloc_root() | | |- if (root->reloc_root) | | | | |- root->reloc_root = NULL | | |- btrfs_drop_snapshot(reloc_root); |- reloc_root->last_trans| = trans->transid | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Use after free [FIX] Fix it by the following modifications: - Test if the root has dead reloc tree before accessing root->reloc_root If the root has BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, then we don't need to create or update root->reloc_tree - Clear the BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE flag until we have fully dropped reloc tree To co-operate with above modification, so as long as BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE is still set, we won't try to re-create reloc tree at record_root_in_trans(). Reported-by: Cebtenzzre Fixes: d2311e698578 ("btrfs: relocation: Delay reloc tree deletion after merge_reloc_roots") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.1+ Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik Reviewed-by: Filipe Manana Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/relocation.c | 9 ++++++++- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c index 2f0e25afa486..00504657b602 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/relocation.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/relocation.c @@ -1435,6 +1435,13 @@ int btrfs_init_reloc_root(struct btrfs_trans_handle *trans, int clear_rsv = 0; int ret; + /* + * The subvolume has reloc tree but the swap is finished, no need to + * create/update the dead reloc tree + */ + if (test_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state)) + return 0; + if (root->reloc_root) { reloc_root = root->reloc_root; reloc_root->last_trans = trans->transid; @@ -2187,7 +2194,6 @@ static int clean_dirty_subvols(struct reloc_control *rc) /* Merged subvolume, cleanup its reloc root */ struct btrfs_root *reloc_root = root->reloc_root; - clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state); list_del_init(&root->reloc_dirty_list); root->reloc_root = NULL; if (reloc_root) { @@ -2196,6 +2202,7 @@ static int clean_dirty_subvols(struct reloc_control *rc) if (ret2 < 0 && !ret) ret = ret2; } + clear_bit(BTRFS_ROOT_DEAD_RELOC_TREE, &root->state); btrfs_put_fs_root(root); } else { /* Orphan reloc tree, just clean it up */ From fab273595507a9ec7035df6d5512a955d80a80ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo Date: Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:13:27 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 6/8] btrfs: Fix a regression which we can't convert to SINGLE profile [BUG] With v5.3 kernel, we can't convert to SINGLE profile: # btrfs balance start -f -dconvert=single $mnt ERROR: error during balancing '/mnt/btrfs': Invalid argument # dmesg -t | tail validate_convert_profile: data profile=0x1000000000000 allowed=0x20 is_valid=1 final=0x1000000000000 ret=1 BTRFS error (device dm-3): balance: invalid convert data profile single [CAUSE] With the extra debug output added, it shows that the @allowed bit is lacking the special in-memory only SINGLE profile bit. Thus we fail at that (profile & ~allowed) check. This regression is caused by commit 081db89b13cb ("btrfs: use raid_attr to get allowed profiles for balance conversion") and the fact that we don't use any bit to indicate SINGLE profile on-disk, but uses special in-memory only bit to help distinguish different profiles. [FIX] Add that BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE to @allowed, so the code should be the same as it was and fix the regression. Reported-by: Chris Murphy Fixes: 081db89b13cb ("btrfs: use raid_attr to get allowed profiles for balance conversion") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.3+ Reviewed-by: Anand Jain Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Reviewed-by: David Sterba Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/volumes.c | 8 +++++++- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c index a324480bc88b..cdd7af424033 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/volumes.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/volumes.c @@ -4063,7 +4063,13 @@ int btrfs_balance(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, } num_devices = btrfs_num_devices(fs_info); - allowed = 0; + + /* + * SINGLE profile on-disk has no profile bit, but in-memory we have a + * special bit for it, to make it easier to distinguish. Thus we need + * to set it manually, or balance would refuse the profile. + */ + allowed = BTRFS_AVAIL_ALLOC_BIT_SINGLE; for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(btrfs_raid_array); i++) if (num_devices >= btrfs_raid_array[i].devs_min) allowed |= btrfs_raid_array[i].bg_flag; From bab32fc069ce8829c416e8737c119f62a57970f9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:02:38 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 7/8] btrfs: qgroup: Fix the wrong target io_tree when freeing reserved data space [BUG] Under the following case with qgroup enabled, if some error happened after we have reserved delalloc space, then in error handling path, we could cause qgroup data space leakage: From btrfs_truncate_block() in inode.c: ret = btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space(inode, &data_reserved, block_start, blocksize); if (ret) goto out; again: page = find_or_create_page(mapping, index, mask); if (!page) { btrfs_delalloc_release_space(inode, data_reserved, block_start, blocksize, true); btrfs_delalloc_release_extents(BTRFS_I(inode), blocksize, true); ret = -ENOMEM; goto out; } [CAUSE] In the above case, btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() will call btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data() and mark the io_tree range with EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag. In the error handling path, we have the following call stack: btrfs_delalloc_release_space() |- btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() |- btrsf_qgroup_free_data() |- __btrfs_qgroup_release_data(reserved=@reserved, free=1) |- qgroup_free_reserved_data(reserved=@reserved) |- clear_record_extent_bits(); |- freed += changeset.bytes_changed; However due to a completion bug, qgroup_free_reserved_data() will clear EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag in BTRFS_I(inode)->io_failure_tree, other than the correct BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree. Since io_failure_tree is never marked with that flag, btrfs_qgroup_free_data() will not free any data reserved space at all, causing a leakage. This type of error handling can only be triggered by errors outside of qgroup code. So EDQUOT error from qgroup can't trigger it. [FIX] Fix the wrong target io_tree. Reported-by: Josef Bacik Fixes: bc42bda22345 ("btrfs: qgroup: Fix qgroup reserved space underflow by only freeing reserved ranges") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.14+ Reviewed-by: Nikolay Borisov Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 52701c1be109..4ab85555a947 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -3486,7 +3486,7 @@ static int qgroup_free_reserved_data(struct inode *inode, * EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED, we won't double free. * So not need to rush. */ - ret = clear_record_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_failure_tree, + ret = clear_record_extent_bits(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, free_start, free_start + free_len - 1, EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED, &changeset); if (ret < 0) From d4e204948fe3e0dc8e1fbf3f8f3290c9c2823be3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Qu Wenruo Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 20:02:39 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 8/8] btrfs: qgroup: Fix reserved data space leak if we have multiple reserve calls [BUG] The following script can cause btrfs qgroup data space leak: mkfs.btrfs -f $dev mount $dev -o nospace_cache $mnt btrfs subv create $mnt/subv btrfs quota en $mnt btrfs quota rescan -w $mnt btrfs qgroup limit 128m $mnt/subv for (( i = 0; i < 3; i++)); do # Create 3 64M holes for latter fallocate to fail truncate -s 192m $mnt/subv/file xfs_io -c "pwrite 64m 4k" $mnt/subv/file > /dev/null xfs_io -c "pwrite 128m 4k" $mnt/subv/file > /dev/null sync # it's supposed to fail, and each failure will leak at least 64M # data space xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 192m" $mnt/subv/file &> /dev/null rm $mnt/subv/file sync done # Shouldn't fail after we removed the file xfs_io -f -c "falloc 0 64m" $mnt/subv/file [CAUSE] Btrfs qgroup data reserve code allow multiple reservations to happen on a single extent_changeset: E.g: btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, 0, SZ_1M); btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, SZ_1M, SZ_2M); btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data(inode, &data_reserved, 0, SZ_4M); Btrfs qgroup code has its internal tracking to make sure we don't double-reserve in above example. The only pattern utilizing this feature is in the main while loop of btrfs_fallocate() function. However btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data()'s error handling has a bug in that on error it clears all ranges in the io_tree with EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag but doesn't free previously reserved bytes. This bug has a two fold effect: - Clearing EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED ranges This is the correct behavior, but it prevents btrfs_qgroup_check_reserved_leak() to catch the leakage as the detector is purely EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED flag based. - Leak the previously reserved data bytes. The bug manifests when N calls to btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data are made and the last one fails, leaking space reserved in the previous ones. [FIX] Also free previously reserved data bytes when btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data fails. Fixes: 524725537023 ("btrfs: qgroup: Introduce btrfs_qgroup_reserve_data function") CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 4.4+ Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo Signed-off-by: David Sterba --- fs/btrfs/qgroup.c | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c index 4ab85555a947..c4bb69941c77 100644 --- a/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c +++ b/fs/btrfs/qgroup.c @@ -3442,6 +3442,9 @@ cleanup: while ((unode = ulist_next(&reserved->range_changed, &uiter))) clear_extent_bit(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, unode->val, unode->aux, EXTENT_QGROUP_RESERVED, 0, 0, NULL); + /* Also free data bytes of already reserved one */ + btrfs_qgroup_free_refroot(root->fs_info, root->root_key.objectid, + orig_reserved, BTRFS_QGROUP_RSV_DATA); extent_changeset_release(reserved); return ret; }