s390/head.s: use zero as address for stfl
The architecture suggests to use address 0 as parameter for stfl, to allow for future extensions. Using __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST (0x200) shows which address is used, but might be not future proof. Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d59b93da5e
commit
b881dcfbf7
|
@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ ENTRY(startup_kdump)
|
|||
xc __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST(8),__LC_STFL_FAC_LIST
|
||||
#ifndef CONFIG_MARCH_G5
|
||||
# check capabilities against MARCH_{G5,Z900,Z990,Z9_109,Z10}
|
||||
.insn s,0xb2b10000,__LC_STFL_FAC_LIST # store facility list
|
||||
.insn s,0xb2b10000,0 # store facilities @ __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST
|
||||
tm __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST,0x01 # stfle available ?
|
||||
jz 0f
|
||||
la %r0,1
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue