s390/head.s: use zero as address for stfl

The architecture suggests to use address 0 as parameter for stfl,
to allow for future extensions. Using __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST (0x200)
shows which address is used, but might be not future proof.

Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
Christian Borntraeger 2014-09-19 15:46:02 +02:00 committed by Martin Schwidefsky
parent d59b93da5e
commit b881dcfbf7
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -398,7 +398,7 @@ ENTRY(startup_kdump)
xc __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST(8),__LC_STFL_FAC_LIST
#ifndef CONFIG_MARCH_G5
# check capabilities against MARCH_{G5,Z900,Z990,Z9_109,Z10}
.insn s,0xb2b10000,__LC_STFL_FAC_LIST # store facility list
.insn s,0xb2b10000,0 # store facilities @ __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST
tm __LC_STFL_FAC_LIST,0x01 # stfle available ?
jz 0f
la %r0,1