mtd: nand: rearrange ONFI revision checking, add ONFI 2.3
In checking for the ONFI revision, the first conditional (for checking "unsupported" ONFI) seems unnecessary. All ONFI revisions should be backwards-compatible; even if this is not the case on some newer ONFI revision, it should simply fail the second version-checking if-else block (i.e., the bit-fields for 1.0, 2.0, etc. would not be set to 1). Thus, we move our "unsupported" condition after having checked each bit field. Also, it's simple enough to add a condition for ONFI revision 2.3. Note that this does *NOT* mean we handle all new features of ONFI versions above 1.0. Signed-off-by: Brian Norris <computersforpeace@gmail.com> Acked-by: Florian Fainelli <ffainelli@freebox.fr> Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0b524fb931
commit
b7b1a29d94
|
@ -2865,20 +2865,24 @@ static int nand_flash_detect_onfi(struct mtd_info *mtd, struct nand_chip *chip,
|
|||
|
||||
/* check version */
|
||||
val = le16_to_cpu(p->revision);
|
||||
if (val == 1 || val > (1 << 4)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: unsupported ONFI version: %d\n",
|
||||
__func__, val);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (val & (1 << 4))
|
||||
if (val & (1 << 5))
|
||||
chip->onfi_version = 23;
|
||||
else if (val & (1 << 4))
|
||||
chip->onfi_version = 22;
|
||||
else if (val & (1 << 3))
|
||||
chip->onfi_version = 21;
|
||||
else if (val & (1 << 2))
|
||||
chip->onfi_version = 20;
|
||||
else
|
||||
else if (val & (1 << 1))
|
||||
chip->onfi_version = 10;
|
||||
else
|
||||
chip->onfi_version = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!chip->onfi_version) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "%s: unsupported ONFI version: %d\n",
|
||||
__func__, val);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
sanitize_string(p->manufacturer, sizeof(p->manufacturer));
|
||||
sanitize_string(p->model, sizeof(p->model));
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue