mfd: Add missing max8997 static storage class specifier
Fixes the following sparse warnings: drivers/mfd/max8997.c:209:4: warning: symbol 'max8997_dumpaddr_pmic' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/max8997.c:334:4: warning: symbol 'max8997_dumpaddr_muic' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/max8997.c:344:4: warning: symbol 'max8997_dumpaddr_haptic' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/mfd/max8997.c:426:25: warning: symbol 'max8997_pm' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Sachin Kamat <sachin.kamat@linaro.org> Acked-by: MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b04c530c78
commit
b673e24c0a
|
@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id max8997_i2c_id[] = {
|
|||
};
|
||||
MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, max8998_i2c_id);
|
||||
|
||||
u8 max8997_dumpaddr_pmic[] = {
|
||||
static u8 max8997_dumpaddr_pmic[] = {
|
||||
MAX8997_REG_INT1MSK,
|
||||
MAX8997_REG_INT2MSK,
|
||||
MAX8997_REG_INT3MSK,
|
||||
|
@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ u8 max8997_dumpaddr_pmic[] = {
|
|||
MAX8997_REG_DVSOKTIMER5,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
u8 max8997_dumpaddr_muic[] = {
|
||||
static u8 max8997_dumpaddr_muic[] = {
|
||||
MAX8997_MUIC_REG_INTMASK1,
|
||||
MAX8997_MUIC_REG_INTMASK2,
|
||||
MAX8997_MUIC_REG_INTMASK3,
|
||||
|
@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ u8 max8997_dumpaddr_muic[] = {
|
|||
MAX8997_MUIC_REG_CONTROL3,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
u8 max8997_dumpaddr_haptic[] = {
|
||||
static u8 max8997_dumpaddr_haptic[] = {
|
||||
MAX8997_HAPTIC_REG_CONF1,
|
||||
MAX8997_HAPTIC_REG_CONF2,
|
||||
MAX8997_HAPTIC_REG_DRVCONF,
|
||||
|
@ -423,7 +423,7 @@ static int max8997_resume(struct device *dev)
|
|||
return max8997_irq_resume(max8997);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
const struct dev_pm_ops max8997_pm = {
|
||||
static const struct dev_pm_ops max8997_pm = {
|
||||
.suspend = max8997_suspend,
|
||||
.resume = max8997_resume,
|
||||
.freeze = max8997_freeze,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue