drm/ttm: fix two bugs in new placement routines.
a) the loops were going to <= not <, leading to illegal memory access b) the busy placement checks were using the placement arrays not the busy placement ones. Acked-by: Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
b8ff7357da
commit
b663752627
|
@ -849,7 +849,7 @@ int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
|||
int i, ret;
|
||||
|
||||
mem->mm_node = NULL;
|
||||
for (i = 0; i <= placement->num_placement; ++i) {
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < placement->num_placement; ++i) {
|
||||
ret = ttm_mem_type_from_flags(placement->placement[i],
|
||||
&mem_type);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
|
@ -900,8 +900,8 @@ int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
|||
if (!type_found)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
for (i = 0; i <= placement->num_busy_placement; ++i) {
|
||||
ret = ttm_mem_type_from_flags(placement->placement[i],
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < placement->num_busy_placement; ++i) {
|
||||
ret = ttm_mem_type_from_flags(placement->busy_placement[i],
|
||||
&mem_type);
|
||||
if (ret)
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
|
@ -911,7 +911,7 @@ int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
|||
if (!ttm_bo_mt_compatible(man,
|
||||
bo->type == ttm_bo_type_user,
|
||||
mem_type,
|
||||
placement->placement[i],
|
||||
placement->busy_placement[i],
|
||||
&cur_flags))
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -921,7 +921,7 @@ int ttm_bo_mem_space(struct ttm_buffer_object *bo,
|
|||
* Use the access and other non-mapping-related flag bits from
|
||||
* the memory placement flags to the current flags
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ttm_flag_masked(&cur_flags, placement->placement[i],
|
||||
ttm_flag_masked(&cur_flags, placement->busy_placement[i],
|
||||
~TTM_PL_MASK_MEMTYPE);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = ttm_bo_mem_force_space(bo, mem_type, placement, mem,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue