uprobes/x86: Only rep+nop can be emulated correctly
__skip_sstep() correctly detects the "nontrivial" nop insns, but since it doesn't update regs->ip we can not really skip "0x0f 0x1f | 0x0f 0x19 | 0x87 0xc0", the probed application is killed by SIGILL'ed handle_swbp(). Remove these additional checks. If we want to implement this correctly we need to know the full insn length to update ->ip. rep* + nop is fine even without updating ->ip. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ec75fba93e
commit
b64b9c937a
|
@ -651,31 +651,19 @@ void arch_uprobe_abort_xol(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Skip these instructions as per the currently known x86 ISA.
|
* Skip these instructions as per the currently known x86 ISA.
|
||||||
* 0x66* { 0x90 | 0x0f 0x1f | 0x0f 0x19 | 0x87 0xc0 }
|
* rep=0x66*; nop=0x90
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
static bool __skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
static bool __skip_sstep(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||||
{
|
{
|
||||||
int i;
|
int i;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
for (i = 0; i < MAX_UINSN_BYTES; i++) {
|
for (i = 0; i < MAX_UINSN_BYTES; i++) {
|
||||||
if ((auprobe->insn[i] == 0x66))
|
if (auprobe->insn[i] == 0x66)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (auprobe->insn[i] == 0x90)
|
if (auprobe->insn[i] == 0x90)
|
||||||
return true;
|
return true;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (i == (MAX_UINSN_BYTES - 1))
|
|
||||||
break;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((auprobe->insn[i] == 0x0f) && (auprobe->insn[i+1] == 0x1f))
|
|
||||||
return true;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((auprobe->insn[i] == 0x0f) && (auprobe->insn[i+1] == 0x19))
|
|
||||||
return true;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if ((auprobe->insn[i] == 0x87) && (auprobe->insn[i+1] == 0xc0))
|
|
||||||
return true;
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
break;
|
break;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
return false;
|
return false;
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue