pwm: clps711x: Fix period calculation
Commit e39c0df1be
("pwm: Introduce the pwm_args concept") has
changed the variable for the period for clps711x-pwm driver, so now
pwm_get/set_period() works with pwm->state.period variable instead
of pwm->args.period.
This patch changes the period variable in other places where it is used.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@mail.ru>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
e747cbe257
commit
b0f17570b8
|
@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static void clps711x_pwm_update_val(struct clps711x_chip *priv, u32 n, u32 v)
|
|||
static unsigned int clps711x_get_duty(struct pwm_device *pwm, unsigned int v)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/* Duty cycle 0..15 max */
|
||||
return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(v * 0xf, pwm_get_period(pwm));
|
||||
return DIV_ROUND_CLOSEST(v * 0xf, pwm->args.period);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int clps711x_pwm_request(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm)
|
||||
|
@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int clps711x_pwm_config(struct pwm_chip *chip, struct pwm_device *pwm,
|
|||
struct clps711x_chip *priv = to_clps711x_chip(chip);
|
||||
unsigned int duty;
|
||||
|
||||
if (period_ns != pwm_get_period(pwm))
|
||||
if (period_ns != pwm->args.period)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
duty = clps711x_get_duty(pwm, duty_ns);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue