posix-cpu-timers: Provide array based sample functions
Instead of using task_cputime and doing the addition of utime and stime at all call sites, it's way simpler to have a sample array which allows indexed based checks against the expiry cache array. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de> Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190821192921.590362974@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
bbc9bae1e4
commit
b0d524f779
|
@ -202,6 +202,32 @@ static u64 cpu_clock_sample(const clockid_t clkid, struct task_struct *p)
|
||||||
return 0;
|
return 0;
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static inline void store_samples(u64 *samples, u64 stime, u64 utime, u64 rtime)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
samples[CPUCLOCK_PROF] = stime + utime;
|
||||||
|
samples[CPUCLOCK_VIRT] = utime;
|
||||||
|
samples[CPUCLOCK_SCHED] = rtime;
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static void task_sample_cputime(struct task_struct *p, u64 *samples)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
u64 stime, utime;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
task_cputime(p, &utime, &stime);
|
||||||
|
store_samples(samples, stime, utime, p->se.sum_exec_runtime);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
static void proc_sample_cputime_atomic(struct task_cputime_atomic *at,
|
||||||
|
u64 *samples)
|
||||||
|
{
|
||||||
|
u64 stime, utime, rtime;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
utime = atomic64_read(&at->utime);
|
||||||
|
stime = atomic64_read(&at->stime);
|
||||||
|
rtime = atomic64_read(&at->sum_exec_runtime);
|
||||||
|
store_samples(samples, stime, utime, rtime);
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/*
|
/*
|
||||||
* Set cputime to sum_cputime if sum_cputime > cputime. Use cmpxchg
|
* Set cputime to sum_cputime if sum_cputime > cputime. Use cmpxchg
|
||||||
* to avoid race conditions with concurrent updates to cputime.
|
* to avoid race conditions with concurrent updates to cputime.
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue