[DECNET] address: Rename rtmsg_ifa() to dn_ifaddr_notify()
The name rtmsg_ifa is heavly overused and confusing. Signed-off-by: Thomas Graf <tgraf@suug.ch> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
a6f01cace3
commit
b020b942cd
|
@ -73,7 +73,7 @@ static BLOCKING_NOTIFIER_HEAD(dnaddr_chain);
|
|||
|
||||
static struct dn_dev *dn_dev_create(struct net_device *dev, int *err);
|
||||
static void dn_dev_delete(struct net_device *dev);
|
||||
static void rtmsg_ifa(int event, struct dn_ifaddr *ifa);
|
||||
static void dn_ifaddr_notify(int event, struct dn_ifaddr *ifa);
|
||||
|
||||
static int dn_eth_up(struct net_device *);
|
||||
static void dn_eth_down(struct net_device *);
|
||||
|
@ -440,7 +440,7 @@ static void dn_dev_del_ifa(struct dn_dev *dn_db, struct dn_ifaddr **ifap, int de
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rtmsg_ifa(RTM_DELADDR, ifa1);
|
||||
dn_ifaddr_notify(RTM_DELADDR, ifa1);
|
||||
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dnaddr_chain, NETDEV_DOWN, ifa1);
|
||||
if (destroy) {
|
||||
dn_dev_free_ifa(ifa1);
|
||||
|
@ -475,7 +475,7 @@ static int dn_dev_insert_ifa(struct dn_dev *dn_db, struct dn_ifaddr *ifa)
|
|||
ifa->ifa_next = dn_db->ifa_list;
|
||||
dn_db->ifa_list = ifa;
|
||||
|
||||
rtmsg_ifa(RTM_NEWADDR, ifa);
|
||||
dn_ifaddr_notify(RTM_NEWADDR, ifa);
|
||||
blocking_notifier_call_chain(&dnaddr_chain, NETDEV_UP, ifa);
|
||||
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
@ -749,7 +749,7 @@ rtattr_failure:
|
|||
return -1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void rtmsg_ifa(int event, struct dn_ifaddr *ifa)
|
||||
static void dn_ifaddr_notify(int event, struct dn_ifaddr *ifa)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct sk_buff *skb;
|
||||
int err = -ENOBUFS;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue