workqueue: Rename workqueue_attrs->no_numa to ->ordered

With the recent removal of NUMA related module param and sysfs knob,
workqueue_attrs->no_numa is now only used to implement ordered workqueues.
Let's rename the field so that it's less confusing especially with the
planned CPU affinity awareness improvements.

Just a rename. No functional changes.

Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Tejun Heo 2023-08-07 15:57:23 -10:00
parent 636b927eba
commit af73f5c9fe
2 changed files with 12 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -142,13 +142,13 @@ struct workqueue_attrs {
cpumask_var_t cpumask;
/**
* @no_numa: disable NUMA affinity
* @ordered: work items must be executed one by one in queueing order
*
* Unlike other fields, ``no_numa`` isn't a property of a worker_pool. It
* Unlike other fields, ``ordered`` isn't a property of a worker_pool. It
* only modifies how :c:func:`apply_workqueue_attrs` select pools and thus
* doesn't participate in pool hash calculations or equality comparisons.
*/
bool no_numa;
bool ordered;
};
static inline struct delayed_work *to_delayed_work(struct work_struct *work)

View File

@ -3672,10 +3672,10 @@ static void copy_workqueue_attrs(struct workqueue_attrs *to,
cpumask_copy(to->cpumask, from->cpumask);
/*
* Unlike hash and equality test, this function doesn't ignore
* ->no_numa as it is used for both pool and wq attrs. Instead,
* get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears ->no_numa after copying.
* ->ordered as it is used for both pool and wq attrs. Instead,
* get_unbound_pool() explicitly clears ->ordered after copying.
*/
to->no_numa = from->no_numa;
to->ordered = from->ordered;
}
/* hash value of the content of @attr */
@ -3933,10 +3933,10 @@ static struct worker_pool *get_unbound_pool(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs)
pool->node = target_node;
/*
* no_numa isn't a worker_pool attribute, always clear it. See
* ordered isn't a worker_pool attribute, always clear it. See
* 'struct workqueue_attrs' comments for detail.
*/
pool->attrs->no_numa = false;
pool->attrs->ordered = false;
if (worker_pool_assign_id(pool) < 0)
goto fail;
@ -4141,7 +4141,7 @@ static struct pool_workqueue *alloc_unbound_pwq(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
static void wq_calc_node_cpumask(const struct workqueue_attrs *attrs, int node,
int cpu_going_down, cpumask_t *cpumask)
{
if (!wq_numa_enabled || attrs->no_numa)
if (!wq_numa_enabled || attrs->ordered)
goto use_dfl;
/* does @node have any online CPUs @attrs wants? */
@ -4253,7 +4253,7 @@ apply_wqattrs_prepare(struct workqueue_struct *wq,
goto out_free;
for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
if (new_attrs->no_numa) {
if (new_attrs->ordered) {
ctx->dfl_pwq->refcnt++;
ctx->pwq_tbl[cpu] = ctx->dfl_pwq;
} else {
@ -4411,7 +4411,7 @@ static void wq_update_unbound_numa(struct workqueue_struct *wq, int cpu,
lockdep_assert_held(&wq_pool_mutex);
if (!wq_numa_enabled || !(wq->flags & WQ_UNBOUND) ||
wq->unbound_attrs->no_numa)
wq->unbound_attrs->ordered)
return;
/*
@ -6358,11 +6358,10 @@ void __init workqueue_init_early(void)
/*
* An ordered wq should have only one pwq as ordering is
* guaranteed by max_active which is enforced by pwqs.
* Turn off NUMA so that dfl_pwq is used for all nodes.
*/
BUG_ON(!(attrs = alloc_workqueue_attrs()));
attrs->nice = std_nice[i];
attrs->no_numa = true;
attrs->ordered = true;
ordered_wq_attrs[i] = attrs;
}