KVM: dynamic halt-polling
There is a downside of always-poll since poll is still happened for idle vCPUs which can waste cpu usage. This patchset add the ability to adjust halt_poll_ns dynamically, to grow halt_poll_ns when shot halt is detected, and to shrink halt_poll_ns when long halt is detected. There are two new kernel parameters for changing the halt_poll_ns: halt_poll_ns_grow and halt_poll_ns_shrink. no-poll always-poll dynamic-poll ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Idle (nohz) vCPU %c0 0.15% 0.3% 0.2% Idle (250HZ) vCPU %c0 1.1% 4.6%~14% 1.2% TCP_RR latency 34us 27us 26.7us "Idle (X) vCPU %c0" is the percent of time the physical cpu spent in c0 over 60 seconds (each vCPU is pinned to a pCPU). (nohz) means the guest was tickless. (250HZ) means the guest was ticking at 250HZ. The big win is with ticking operating systems. Running the linux guest with nohz=off (and HZ=250), we save 3.4%~12.8% CPUs/second and get close to no-polling overhead levels by using the dynamic-poll. The savings should be even higher for higher frequency ticks. Suggested-by: David Matlack <dmatlack@google.com> Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <wanpeng.li@hotmail.com> [Simplify the patch. - Paolo] Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
19020f8ab8
commit
aca6ff29c4
|
@ -66,9 +66,18 @@
|
|||
MODULE_AUTHOR("Qumranet");
|
||||
MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned int halt_poll_ns;
|
||||
/* halt polling only reduces halt latency by 5-7 us, 500us is enough */
|
||||
static unsigned int halt_poll_ns = 500000;
|
||||
module_param(halt_poll_ns, uint, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Default doubles per-vcpu halt_poll_ns. */
|
||||
static unsigned int halt_poll_ns_grow = 2;
|
||||
module_param(halt_poll_ns_grow, int, S_IRUGO);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Default resets per-vcpu halt_poll_ns . */
|
||||
static unsigned int halt_poll_ns_shrink;
|
||||
module_param(halt_poll_ns_shrink, int, S_IRUGO);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Ordering of locks:
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -1907,6 +1916,31 @@ void kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gfn_t gfn)
|
|||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_mark_page_dirty);
|
||||
|
||||
static void grow_halt_poll_ns(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int val = vcpu->halt_poll_ns;
|
||||
|
||||
/* 10us base */
|
||||
if (val == 0 && halt_poll_ns_grow)
|
||||
val = 10000;
|
||||
else
|
||||
val *= halt_poll_ns_grow;
|
||||
|
||||
vcpu->halt_poll_ns = val;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void shrink_halt_poll_ns(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int val = vcpu->halt_poll_ns;
|
||||
|
||||
if (halt_poll_ns_shrink == 0)
|
||||
val = 0;
|
||||
else
|
||||
val /= halt_poll_ns_shrink;
|
||||
|
||||
vcpu->halt_poll_ns = val;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static int kvm_vcpu_check_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (kvm_arch_vcpu_runnable(vcpu)) {
|
||||
|
@ -1929,6 +1963,7 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
|||
ktime_t start, cur;
|
||||
DEFINE_WAIT(wait);
|
||||
bool waited = false;
|
||||
u64 block_ns;
|
||||
|
||||
start = cur = ktime_get();
|
||||
if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns) {
|
||||
|
@ -1961,7 +1996,21 @@ void kvm_vcpu_block(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
|
|||
cur = ktime_get();
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start), waited);
|
||||
block_ns = ktime_to_ns(cur) - ktime_to_ns(start);
|
||||
|
||||
if (halt_poll_ns) {
|
||||
if (block_ns <= vcpu->halt_poll_ns)
|
||||
;
|
||||
/* we had a long block, shrink polling */
|
||||
else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns && block_ns > halt_poll_ns)
|
||||
shrink_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
|
||||
/* we had a short halt and our poll time is too small */
|
||||
else if (vcpu->halt_poll_ns < halt_poll_ns &&
|
||||
block_ns < halt_poll_ns)
|
||||
grow_halt_poll_ns(vcpu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
trace_kvm_vcpu_wakeup(block_ns, waited);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kvm_vcpu_block);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue