cpufreq: intel_pstate: Use locking in intel_pstate_resume()
Theoretically, intel_pstate_resume() may be executed in parallel with intel_pstate_set_policy(), if the latter is invoked via cpufreq_update_policy() as a result of a notification, so use intel_pstate_limits_lock in there too to avoid race conditions. Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: Srinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
366430b5c2
commit
aa439248ab
|
@ -914,12 +914,20 @@ static int intel_pstate_hwp_save_state(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
|
|||
|
||||
static int intel_pstate_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!hwp_active)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_lock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
all_cpu_data[policy->cpu]->epp_policy = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
return intel_pstate_hwp_set_policy(policy);
|
||||
ret = intel_pstate_hwp_set_policy(policy);
|
||||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&intel_pstate_limits_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void intel_pstate_hwp_set_online_cpus(void)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue