DM RAID: Use safe version of rdev_for_each
Fix segfault caused by using rdev_for_each instead of rdev_for_each_safe
Commit dafb20fa34
mistakenly replaced a safe
iterator with an unsafe one when making some macro changes.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
afbaa90b80
commit
a9ad8526bb
|
@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs)
|
||||||
int ret;
|
int ret;
|
||||||
unsigned redundancy = 0;
|
unsigned redundancy = 0;
|
||||||
struct raid_dev *dev;
|
struct raid_dev *dev;
|
||||||
struct md_rdev *rdev, *freshest;
|
struct md_rdev *rdev, *tmp, *freshest;
|
||||||
struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md;
|
struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
switch (rs->raid_type->level) {
|
switch (rs->raid_type->level) {
|
||||||
|
@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs)
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
freshest = NULL;
|
freshest = NULL;
|
||||||
rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
|
rdev_for_each_safe(rdev, tmp, mddev) {
|
||||||
if (!rdev->meta_bdev)
|
if (!rdev->meta_bdev)
|
||||||
continue;
|
continue;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue