DM RAID: Use safe version of rdev_for_each

Fix segfault caused by using rdev_for_each instead of rdev_for_each_safe

Commit dafb20fa34 mistakenly replaced a safe
iterator with an unsafe one when making some macro changes.

Signed-off-by: Jonathan Brassow <jbrassow@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
Jonathan Brassow 2012-04-24 10:23:13 +10:00 committed by NeilBrown
parent afbaa90b80
commit a9ad8526bb
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -859,7 +859,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs)
int ret;
unsigned redundancy = 0;
struct raid_dev *dev;
struct md_rdev *rdev, *freshest;
struct md_rdev *rdev, *tmp, *freshest;
struct mddev *mddev = &rs->md;
switch (rs->raid_type->level) {
@ -877,7 +877,7 @@ static int analyse_superblocks(struct dm_target *ti, struct raid_set *rs)
}
freshest = NULL;
rdev_for_each(rdev, mddev) {
rdev_for_each_safe(rdev, tmp, mddev) {
if (!rdev->meta_bdev)
continue;