drm/i915: Fix ilk+ watermarks when disabling pipes
We're no longer programming any watermarks when we're disabling a pipe. That means ilk_wm_merge() & co. will keep considering the any pipe that is getting disabled as still enabled. Thus we either get no LP1+ watermakrs (ilk-ivb), or we get suboptimal ones (hsw-bdw). This seems to have been broken by commitb6b178a772
("drm/i915: Calculate ironlake intermediate watermarks correctly, v2."). Before that we apparently had some difference between the intermediate and optimal watermarks and so we would program the optiomal ones. Now intermediate and optimal are identical for disabled pipes and so we don't program either. Fix this by programming the intermediate watermarks even for disabled pipes. We were already doing that for skl+. We'll leave out gmch platforms for now since those do the merging in a different manner and should work as is. We'll want to unify this eventually, but play it safe for now and just put in a FIXME. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Cc: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Fixes:b6b178a772
("drm/i915: Calculate ironlake intermediate watermarks correctly, v2.") Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181025130536.29024-1-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> #irc
This commit is contained in:
parent
34b2f8da9d
commit
a748faea3b
|
@ -12834,17 +12834,12 @@ static void intel_atomic_commit_tail(struct drm_atomic_state *state)
|
|||
intel_check_cpu_fifo_underruns(dev_priv);
|
||||
intel_check_pch_fifo_underruns(dev_priv);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!new_crtc_state->active) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Make sure we don't call initial_watermarks
|
||||
* for ILK-style watermark updates.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* No clue what this is supposed to achieve.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (INTEL_GEN(dev_priv) >= 9)
|
||||
dev_priv->display.initial_watermarks(intel_state,
|
||||
new_intel_crtc_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
/* FIXME unify this for all platforms */
|
||||
if (!new_crtc_state->active &&
|
||||
!HAS_GMCH_DISPLAY(dev_priv) &&
|
||||
dev_priv->display.initial_watermarks)
|
||||
dev_priv->display.initial_watermarks(intel_state,
|
||||
new_intel_crtc_state);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue