x86: Make sure we also print a Code: line for show_regs()
show_regs() is called as a mini BUG() equivalent in some places, specifically for the "scheduling while atomic" case. Unfortunately right now it does not print a Code: line unlike a real bug/oops. This patch changes the x86 implementation of show_regs() so that it calls the same function as oopses do to print the registers as well as the Code: line. Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com> LKML-Reference: <20091102165915.4a980fc0@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1836d95928
commit
a489ca355e
|
@ -187,7 +187,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, int all)
|
|||
|
||||
void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
__show_regs(regs, 1);
|
||||
show_registers(regs);
|
||||
show_trace(NULL, regs, ®s->sp, regs->bp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -226,8 +226,7 @@ void __show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs, int all)
|
|||
|
||||
void show_regs(struct pt_regs *regs)
|
||||
{
|
||||
printk(KERN_INFO "CPU %d:", smp_processor_id());
|
||||
__show_regs(regs, 1);
|
||||
show_registers(regs);
|
||||
show_trace(NULL, regs, (void *)(regs + 1), regs->bp);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue