spi: dw: Set transfer handler before unmasking the IRQs

It turns out the IRQs most like can be unmasked before the controller is
enabled with no problematic consequences. The manual doesn't explicitly
state that, but the examples perform the controller initialization
procedure in that order. So the commit da8f58909e ("spi: dw: Unmask IRQs
after enabling the chip") hasn't been that required as I thought. But
anyway setting the IRQs up after the chip enabling still worth adding
since it has simplified the code a bit. The problem is that it has
introduced a potential bug. The transfer handler pointer is now
initialized after the IRQs are enabled. That may and eventually will cause
an invalid or uninitialized callback invocation. Fix that just by
performing the callback initialization before the IRQ unmask procedure.

Fixes: da8f58909e ("spi: dw: Unmask IRQs after enabling the chip")
Signed-off-by: Serge Semin <Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117094054.4696-1-Sergey.Semin@baikalelectronics.ru
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
Serge Semin 2020-11-17 12:40:54 +03:00 committed by Mark Brown
parent ac9978fcad
commit a41b0ad07b
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 24D68B725D5487D0
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -357,11 +357,11 @@ static void dw_spi_irq_setup(struct dw_spi *dws)
dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_TXFTLR, level);
dw_writel(dws, DW_SPI_RXFTLR, level - 1);
dws->transfer_handler = dw_spi_transfer_handler;
imask = SPI_INT_TXEI | SPI_INT_TXOI | SPI_INT_RXUI | SPI_INT_RXOI |
SPI_INT_RXFI;
spi_umask_intr(dws, imask);
dws->transfer_handler = dw_spi_transfer_handler;
}
/*