staging: lustre: use explicit poll loop in ptlrpc_unregister_reply
replace l_wait_event() with wait_event_idle_timeout() and explicit loop. This approach is easier to understand. Reviewed-by: James Simmons <jsimmons@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com> Reviewed-by: Patrick Farrell <paf@cray.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0a0e5afcb2
commit
9fc53ff230
|
@ -2500,7 +2500,6 @@ static int ptlrpc_unregister_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *request, int async)
|
|||
{
|
||||
int rc;
|
||||
wait_queue_head_t *wq;
|
||||
struct l_wait_info lwi;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Might sleep. */
|
||||
LASSERT(!in_interrupt());
|
||||
|
@ -2543,16 +2542,17 @@ static int ptlrpc_unregister_reply(struct ptlrpc_request *request, int async)
|
|||
* Network access will complete in finite time but the HUGE
|
||||
* timeout lets us CWARN for visibility of sluggish NALs
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lwi = LWI_TIMEOUT_INTERVAL(LONG_UNLINK * HZ,
|
||||
HZ, NULL, NULL);
|
||||
rc = l_wait_event(*wq, !ptlrpc_client_recv_or_unlink(request),
|
||||
&lwi);
|
||||
if (rc == 0) {
|
||||
int cnt = 0;
|
||||
while (cnt < LONG_UNLINK &&
|
||||
(rc = wait_event_idle_timeout(*wq,
|
||||
!ptlrpc_client_recv_or_unlink(request),
|
||||
HZ)) == 0)
|
||||
cnt += 1;
|
||||
if (rc > 0) {
|
||||
ptlrpc_rqphase_move(request, request->rq_next_phase);
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LASSERT(rc == -ETIMEDOUT);
|
||||
DEBUG_REQ(D_WARNING, request,
|
||||
"Unexpectedly long timeout receiving_reply=%d req_ulinked=%d reply_unlinked=%d",
|
||||
request->rq_receiving_reply,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue