tcp: update reordering first before detecting loss
tcp_mark_lost_retrans is not used when FACK is disabled. Since tcp_update_reordering may disable FACK, it should be called first before tcp_mark_lost_retrans. Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@google.com> Signed-off-by: Nandita Dukkipati <nanditad@google.com> Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
6e9250f59e
commit
9dac883544
|
@ -1820,14 +1820,12 @@ advance_sp:
|
|||
for (j = 0; j < used_sacks; j++)
|
||||
tp->recv_sack_cache[i++] = sp[j];
|
||||
|
||||
tcp_mark_lost_retrans(sk);
|
||||
|
||||
tcp_verify_left_out(tp);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((state.reord < tp->fackets_out) &&
|
||||
((inet_csk(sk)->icsk_ca_state != TCP_CA_Loss) || tp->undo_marker))
|
||||
tcp_update_reordering(sk, tp->fackets_out - state.reord, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
tcp_mark_lost_retrans(sk);
|
||||
tcp_verify_left_out(tp);
|
||||
out:
|
||||
|
||||
#if FASTRETRANS_DEBUG > 0
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue